Talisman of Indulgence
28% of tracked Black-Red Commander decks on Playgroup Live run Talisman of Indulgence, and when drawn it reaches the battlefield 74% of the time, with a median first-cast turn of 3.0.
Talisman of Indulgence sits in 28% of tracked Commander decks on Playgroup Live, appearing in 359 of the 1275 distinct decks that have played a logged game. For a color-restricted two-mana rock, that is a consistent signal of staple status inside the Rakdos slice of the format.
When a copy enters a player's hand, 74% of those copies are cast before the game ends. Median first cast lands on turn 3.0, meaning players who open with or draw the Talisman early tend to deploy it quickly. The 45% on-curve rate is modest for a two-mana card, which mostly reflects copies drawn after the early turns rather than players choosing to hold it. The 45% same-turn cast rate confirms that when players do draw it, they act on it fast roughly half the time.
The dataset is well-distributed: 289 unique players have brought this card to a tracked game, and the single heaviest contributor accounts for just 2% of all instances. That spread strengthens confidence in the directional read, though the overall Playgroup Live sample remains small enough that all figures should be treated as early signals rather than settled conclusions.
- 28% of tracked Commander decks include Talisman of Indulgence
- 74% of drawn copies are cast before the game ends
- T3.0 median first-cast turn across tracked games
- 83% battlefield stickiness once the Talisman resolves
- 45% on-curve rate for this two-mana artifact
- 289 unique players have brought it to a Playgroup Live game
First-cast turn
n=110The "good card" funnel
572 brought · 289 playersOf 572 copies brought to games, 149 were drawn and 110 of those were cast, with the majority of resolved copies still present on the battlefield at the end of the game.
Players who cast this card win 28% of the time (n=109) , vs 23% when it never left the library (n=385).
When players drew this card but left it in hand, they won 23% (n=37) — about the same as leaving it in the library. Those players survived long enough to draw it, so the gap above is about the card resolving, not just about surviving.
Observed gap +5.5pp; 95% confidence interval -3.1pp to +14.1pp. Correlational, not causal: powerful payoffs also get cast more often in games you are already winning.
Final zone distribution
168 instancesThe vast majority of Talisman of Indulgence copies end games on the battlefield or in the graveyard, with very few stranded in the library. That pattern is typical for a low-cost artifact players prioritize casting when drawn.
Commanders that played this card
in tracked games-
1
Valgavoth, Harrower of Souls
23 decks
-
2
Doctor Doom, King of Latveria
21 decks
-
3
Terra, Herald of Hope
16 decks
-
4
Sauron, the Dark Lord
12 decks
-
5
Caesar, Legion's Emperor
10 decks
-
6
Fire Lord Azula
9 decks
-
7
Kefka, Court Mage // Kefka, Ruler of Ruin
9 decks
-
8
Abaddon the Despoiler
8 decks
-
9
Davros, Dalek Creator
8 decks
-
10
Kaalia of the Vast
8 decks
The commander list spans Rakdos, Grixis, and Mardu builds without a dominant single pairing, which is what you expect from a staple valued for colored mana rather than synergy with a specific strategy.