Vial Smasher the Fierce
Global Commander StatsSummary
Vial Smasher the Fierce is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,889 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (532–1357) at an Elo of 1,577, ranking #742 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 5 damage dealt and 0.69 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Vial Smasher the Fierce's win rate? ▾
Vial Smasher the Fierce has a 28% win rate across 1889 recorded Playgroup games (532 wins, 1357 losses).
How long do winning games with Vial Smasher the Fierce take? ▾
Wins with Vial Smasher the Fierce take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 19 days.
How many decks use Vial Smasher the Fierce? ▾
509 decks list Vial Smasher the Fierce as their commander on Playgroup, of which 294 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1741 | AnaVamp | 18 | 14 |
| 2 | 1608 | Taylor Ellis | 20 | 10 |
| 3 | 1606 | Gleeful Simulacrum | 11 | 6 |
| 4 | 1559 | Incraut | 4 | 3 |
| 5 | 1547 | Der Schmerz wird dein sein | 56 | 14 |
How does this commander win?
When Vial Smasher the Fierce wins, 57.52% of wins come via non combat damage across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Vial Smasher the Fierce wins 50.0% of games from position 6 and 17.31% from position 4 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Vial Smasher the Fierce wins 29.27% after 0 mulligans and 50.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Vial Smasher the Fierce 3.82/5 on average, across 1126 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Vial Smasher the Fierce wins, opponents flag the game as salty 60.4% of the time across 543 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Vial Smasher the Fierce. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
