Commander

Flubs, the Fool

Global commander stats

All Temur commanders

1171 Wins

2890 Losses

Overview

Summary

Flubs, the Fool is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 4,133 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (1171–2890) at an Elo of 1,515, ranking #1818 globally.

Wins average 8 turns, with 9131 damage dealt and 0.51 player kills per game on average.

Last full refresh 11 Nov 2026

Sources Scryfall · EDHREC · JSON API

Frequently Asked

What is Flubs, the Fool's win rate?

Flubs, the Fool has a 28% win rate across 4133 recorded Playgroup games (1171 wins, 2890 losses).

How long do winning games with Flubs, the Fool take?

Wins with Flubs, the Fool take on average 8 turns. Total tracked play time: 3 months.

How many decks use Flubs, the Fool?

1,362 decks list Flubs, the Fool as their commander on Playgroup, of which 875 have played at least one recorded game.

Flubs, the Fool Magic: The Gathering commander card art

Buy on TCGplayer

Global rank

1818

Wins by turn (avg.)

Elo rating

1515

Trend

Global Elo trend

Trend

Commander popularity trend

Averages

Misc. stats

Average damage per game 9131

Average commander damage per game 7

Average poison counters given per game 208

Average kills per game 0.51

Average turn length 4 minutes

No. decks for this commander 1362

No. decks with at least one game for this commander 875

No. games played with this commander 4133

Total hours played 3 months

Community

Top 5 public decks

Rank	Elo	User	Games	Wins	Winrate
1	1729	Rags	17	13	79 %
2	1580	Kalipto	5	3	60 %
3	1558	Cortillion	3	2	67 %
4	1556	mrgame1357	4	3	75 %
5	1554	DraeganDeez	6	4	67 %

Outcomes

How does this commander win?

When Flubs, the Fool wins, 43.42% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.

Combat

43.42%

Non Combat Damage

20.31%

Combo

15.96%

Alternative

13.28%

Mill

4.69%

Commander Damage

1.56%

Poison

0.78%

Avg win turn 8.1 based on 1185 wins with recorded turn counts

Measured

Staples that win games for Flubs, the Fool

Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Flubs, the Fool decks that leave them out.

+11.0 pp

Top card: Bone Saw

#	Card	Lift Win-rate lift	Games
1	Bone Saw 69 games	+11.0 pp	69
2	Welding Jar 66 games	+10.6 pp	66
3	Everflowing Chalice 81 games	+10.5 pp	81
4	Blazing Rootwalla 81 games	+8.3 pp	81
5	Chatterstorm 60 games	+4.6 pp	60
6	Laboratory Maniac 206 games	+4.4 pp	206
7	Basking Rootwalla 71 games	+4.2 pp	71
8	Gut Shot 52 games	+3.9 pp	52
9	Wild Cantor 98 games	+3.9 pp	98
10	Nature's Claim 78 games	+3.4 pp	78

Show 5 more (ranks 11-15)

#	Card	Lift Win-rate lift	Games
11	Tormod's Crypt 146 games	+3.3 pp	146
12	Boseiju, Who Endures 159 games	+2.8 pp	159
13	Grapeshot 190 games	+2.4 pp	190
14	Ramunap Excavator 390 games	+2.4 pp	390
15	Temple of the False God 68 games	+2.1 pp	68

Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured

Table position

Does seating order matter?

Flubs, the Fool wins 32.83% of games from position 1 and 17.28% from position 5 across tracked games.

Seat 1

32.83% n=1249

Seat 2

30.79% n=1239

Seat 3

24.87% n=969

Seat 4

22.08% n=616

Seat 5

17.28% n=81

Seat 6

25.0% n=12

Opening hands

Do mulligans hurt this commander?

Across tracked games, Flubs, the Fool wins 28.82% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.

0 mulligans

28.82% n=1799

1 mulligan

26.42% n=687

2 mulligans

25.6% n=250

3 mulligans

23.66% n=93

4 mulligans

25.71% n=35

5 mulligans

12.5% n=8

6 mulligans

0.0% n=3

Player reports

How do players rate games with this commander?

Pilot rating

Pilots rate their own games with Flubs, the Fool 3.73/5 on average, across 2849 self-reports.

3.73 / 5

🧂

Opponent salt

When Flubs, the Fool wins, opponents flag the game as salty 40.9% of the time across 1192 tracked wins.

40.9 \%

Head to head

Best and worst matchups

Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Flubs, the Fool. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.