Saint Traft and Rem Karolus
Global Commander StatsSummary
Saint Traft and Rem Karolus is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 472 recorded Playgroup games, winning 31% of them (151–321) at an Elo of 1,598, ranking #527 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 4 damage dealt and 0.67 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Saint Traft and Rem Karolus's win rate? ▾
Saint Traft and Rem Karolus has a 31% win rate across 472 recorded Playgroup games (151 wins, 321 losses).
How long do winning games with Saint Traft and Rem Karolus take? ▾
Wins with Saint Traft and Rem Karolus take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 5 days.
How many decks use Saint Traft and Rem Karolus? ▾
155 decks list Saint Traft and Rem Karolus as their commander on Playgroup, of which 90 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1676 | ImCaptnFlowers | 30 | 16 |
| 2 | 1627 | Haedes | 22 | 16 |
| 3 | 1535 | DrA_077 | 17 | 5 |
| 4 | 1534 | Lennychu | 6 | 4 |
| 5 | 1530 | Kawashy | 2 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Saint Traft and Rem Karolus wins, 56.48% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Saint Traft and Rem Karolus wins 100.0% of games from position 6 and 0.0% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Saint Traft and Rem Karolus wins 34.91% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 4 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Saint Traft and Rem Karolus 3.55/5 on average, across 310 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Saint Traft and Rem Karolus wins, opponents flag the game as salty 65.2% of the time across 155 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Saint Traft and Rem Karolus. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
