Saint Traft and Rem Karolus
Global Commander StatsSummary
Saint Traft and Rem Karolus is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 463 recorded Playgroup games, winning 31% of them (148–315) at an Elo of 1,578, ranking #727 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 4 damage dealt and 0.67 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Saint Traft and Rem Karolus's win rate? ▾
Saint Traft and Rem Karolus has a 31% win rate across 463 recorded Playgroup games (148 wins, 315 losses).
How long do winning games with Saint Traft and Rem Karolus take? ▾
Wins with Saint Traft and Rem Karolus take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 5 days.
How many decks use Saint Traft and Rem Karolus? ▾
151 decks list Saint Traft and Rem Karolus as their commander on Playgroup, of which 89 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1670 | ImCaptnFlowers | 28 | 15 |
| 2 | 1627 | Haedes | 22 | 16 |
| 3 | 1535 | DrA_077 | 17 | 5 |
| 4 | 1534 | Lennychu | 6 | 4 |
| 5 | 1530 | Kawashy | 2 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Saint Traft and Rem Karolus wins, 56.19% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Saint Traft and Rem Karolus wins 100.0% of games from position 6 and 0.0% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Saint Traft and Rem Karolus wins 34.78% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 4 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Saint Traft and Rem Karolus 3.58/5 on average, across 301 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Saint Traft and Rem Karolus wins, opponents flag the game as salty 64.5% of the time across 152 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Saint Traft and Rem Karolus. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
