Data-Backed · Win Rates

Commander Tier List

Playgroup.gg ranks 795 commanders into five tiers by win rate across 46,400 tracked casual Commander games from the last 30 days. The first Commander tier list based on real gameplay data, not opinions or deck registrations.

As of November 2026, the top Commanders by win rate are Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution (52.89%), Narset, Enlightened Master (50.58%), and Sami, Wildcat Captain (45.16%), from 46,400 tracked games.

The most played commanders over the same window are Jace, Multiverse Architect (2,843 games), Giada, Font of Hope (1,606 games), and Y'shtola, Night's Blessed (1,169 games). Every row shows its play count, so the table doubles as a top commanders ranking by popularity.

795
Ranked
46,400
Games
Methodology
Last Updated

Tiers are assigned by win rate in the rolling last 30 days window. Win rates are normalized to a 4-player baseline (25% expected) so games with different pod sizes are weighted fairly. A commander needs at least 40 tracked games to qualify, and those games must come from at least 10 distinct registered pilots so a single playgroup cannot dominate the ranking. Data comes from games recorded playing paper magic through the Playgroup.gg app and online games played with Playgroup Live. Win rates are calculated from both registered-deck and guest-commander participations. Your own pod counts too: games you track at the table or log after playing feed the same rankings.

S 35%+ Win Rate
A 30-35% Win Rate
B 23-30% Win Rate
C 18-23% Win Rate
D Below 18% Win Rate
S
35%+ Win Rate

S-Tier: Dominant Commanders (35%+ Win Rate)

26
Entries

Winning 40% more often than expected in 4-player pods.

1 S
52.89% · 147 games · ▲+3.99%
2 S
50.58% · 152 games · ▲+18.04%
3 S
45.16% · 62 games · ~
4 S
44.9% · 49 games · ▲+24.01%
5 S
43.69% · 103 games · ▲+3.46%
6 S
43.21% · 46 games · NEW
7 S
41.04% · 67 games · ▲+16.39%
8 S
40.77% · 65 games · NEW
9 S
40.57% · 53 games · ▲+3.33%
10 S
40.53% · 95 games · ▲+5.89%

Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Tier placement may shift as more data is collected.

Your next deck

Found your next commander?

See how it really performs

Rankings are a starting point. Log your own games to see how a commander really performs at your table, with real win rates from real games.

A
30-35% Win Rate

A-Tier: Strong Commanders (30-35% Win Rate)

75
Entries

Consistently above the 25% expected baseline.

1 A
34.8% · 88 games · ▲+11.1%
2 A
34.57% · 64 games · ▲+6.44%
3 A
34.5% · 50 games · ~
4 A
34.38% · 40 games · NEW
5 A
34.11% · 107 games · ~
6 A
34.06% · 69 games · ~
7 A
34.03% · 202 games · ▲+12.36%
8 A
33.98% · 142 games · ▲+5.38%
9 A
33.94% · 109 games · ▲+7.77%
10 A
33.91% · 87 games · ▲+15.16%

Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Tier placement may shift as more data is collected.

B
23-30% Win Rate

B-Tier: Average Commanders (23-30% Win Rate)

295
Entries

Near the expected win rate for 4-player Commander.

1 B
29.98% · 236 games · ~
2 B
29.93% · 147 games · ~
3 B
29.9% · 347 games · ~
4 B
29.88% · 82 games · ▼-4.01%
5 B
29.85% · 103 games · ▲+6.52%
6 B
29.74% · 87 games · ▲+4.74%
7 B
29.65% · 43 games · ~
8 B
29.59% · 49 games · ▼-9.41%
9 B
29.58% · 60 games · ▲+5.91%
10 B
29.54% · 656 games · ~

Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Tier placement may shift as more data is collected.

C
18-23% Win Rate

C-Tier: Below Average Commanders (18-23% Win Rate)

240
Entries

Underperforming the statistical baseline.

1 C
22.98% · 105 games · ▲+5.87%
2 C
22.96% · 49 games · ▲+7.49%
3 C
22.96% · 49 games · NEW
4 C
22.95% · 61 games · ▲+13.62%
5 C
22.92% · 60 games · ~
6 C
22.88% · 118 games · ▲+3.89%
7 C
22.87% · 276 games · ~
8 C
22.84% · 1606 games · ~
9 C
22.78% · 45 games · NEW
10 C
22.78% · 45 games · NEW

Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Tier placement may shift as more data is collected.

D
Below 18% Win Rate

D-Tier: Weak Commanders (Below 18% Win Rate)

159
Entries

Winning significantly less than expected.

1 D
17.99% · 82 games · ▼-3.12%
2 D
17.97% · 64 games · ▼-9.87%
3 D
17.93% · 46 games · ~
4 D
5 D
17.81% · 120 games · NEW
6 D
17.78% · 45 games · ~
7 D
17.77% · 83 games · ~
8 D
17.72% · 79 games · ▼-7.44%
9 D
17.71% · 204 games · ▼-3.87%
10 D
17.67% · 58 games · ▼-8.04%

Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Tier placement may shift as more data is collected.

Frequently Asked

What is the best Commander in MTG right now?
By win rate in the last 30 days, the top Commanders on Playgroup.gg are Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution (52.89%), Narset, Enlightened Master (50.58%), and Sami, Wildcat Captain (45.16%). These rankings come from real tracked games, normalized to a 4-player baseline, and refresh every 6 hours.
How is the Playgroup.gg Commander tier list calculated?
Every commander with at least 40 tracked games and at least 10 distinct registered pilots in the last 30 days is ranked by normalized win rate. Win rates are adjusted to a 4-player baseline (25% expected) so a win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly. Commanders scoring 35% or more are S-tier; 30-35% are A-tier; 23-30% are B-tier; 18-23% are C-tier; and below 18% are D-tier.
What does each tier mean?
S-tier commanders win roughly 40% more games than expected. A-tier wins about 20-40% above expected. B-tier is near the statistical baseline. C-tier is below average. D-tier commanders score below 18%, significantly under the 25% baseline. All values are normalized across pod sizes.
How often is the Commander tier list updated?
The data refreshes every 6 hours. Because it uses a last 30 days window, tiers shift gradually as new games are recorded and old ones age out.
Why is my commander not on the tier list?
A commander needs at least 40 tracked games in the last 30 days, and those games must come from at least 10 different registered pilots. The pilot diversity floor stops a single playgroup or grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck. You can still see all-time stats on any commander's individual page.
How is this different from EDHREC rankings or other tier lists?
EDHREC ranks by deck popularity, counting how many people register a commander. Other tier lists like Draftsim are based on editorial opinion. Playgroup.gg ranks by actual game win rates across thousands of casual Commander games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app and Playgroup Live each month.