Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit
Global Commander StatsSummary
Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 7,889 recorded Playgroup games, winning 30% of them (2383–5506) at an Elo of 1,527, ranking #1375 globally.
Wins average 10 turns, with 10 damage dealt and 0.62 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit's win rate? ▾
Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit has a 30% win rate across 7889 recorded Playgroup games (2383 wins, 5506 losses).
How long do winning games with Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit take? ▾
Wins with Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit take on average 10 turns. Total tracked play time: 10 months.
How many decks use Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit? ▾
2,540 decks list Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit as their commander on Playgroup, of which 1,603 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1668 | adolfo.oes | 20 | 10 |
| 2 | 1629 | Benous | 62 | 33 |
| 3 | 1623 | René | 26 | 11 |
| 4 | 1603 | Paopu | 21 | 9 |
| 5 | 1595 | May_alone | 4 | 3 |
How does this commander win?
When Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit wins, 42.21% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit wins 38.06% of games from position 1 and 16.67% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit wins 29.69% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit 3.73/5 on average, across 5333 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit wins, opponents flag the game as salty 64.2% of the time across 2440 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Frodo, Adventurous Hobbit. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
