Ghoulcaller Gisa
Global commander statsSummary
Ghoulcaller Gisa is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,901 recorded Playgroup games, winning 23% of them (451–1243) at an Elo of 1,478, ranking #4265 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 143887 damage dealt and 0.43 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Ghoulcaller Gisa's win rate?
How long do winning games with Ghoulcaller Gisa take?
How many decks use Ghoulcaller Gisa?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1564 | TheOneDrRandom | 7 | 3 |
| 2 | 1563 | Eldanoor | 9 | 6 |
| 3 | 1548 | MethD33r | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1542 | OSUNightfall | 5 | 3 |
| 5 | 1537 | SpeedLord | 4 | 2 |
How does this commander win?
When Ghoulcaller Gisa wins, 68.49% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Ghoulcaller Gisa
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Ghoulcaller Gisa decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+1.4 pp |
| 2 |
|
+1.2 pp |
| 3 |
|
+1.0 pp |
| 4 |
|
+0.8 pp |
| 5 |
|
+0.8 pp |
| 6 |
|
+0.4 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Ghoulcaller Gisa wins 28.17% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Ghoulcaller Gisa wins 21.68% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 4 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Ghoulcaller Gisa 3.72/5 on average, across 965 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Ghoulcaller Gisa wins, opponents flag the game as salty 19.3% of the time across 451 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Ghoulcaller Gisa. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.