Gisela, Blade of Goldnight
Global Commander StatsSummary
Gisela, Blade of Goldnight is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 651 recorded Playgroup games, winning 33% of them (216–435) at an Elo of 1,561, ranking #902 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 6 damage dealt and 0.67 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Gisela, Blade of Goldnight's win rate? ▾
Gisela, Blade of Goldnight has a 33% win rate across 651 recorded Playgroup games (216 wins, 435 losses).
How long do winning games with Gisela, Blade of Goldnight take? ▾
Wins with Gisela, Blade of Goldnight take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 5 days.
How many decks use Gisela, Blade of Goldnight? ▾
255 decks list Gisela, Blade of Goldnight as their commander on Playgroup, of which 127 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1580 | AK98 | 50 | 19 |
| 2 | 1508 | Roxas48 | 6 | 1 |
| 3 | 1488 | adoracurtiz@yahoo.com | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | 1487 | ArloArts | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | 1435 | hunter rowley | 6 | 0 |
How does this commander win?
When Gisela, Blade of Goldnight wins, 54.97% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Gisela, Blade of Goldnight wins 43.89% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Gisela, Blade of Goldnight wins 35.44% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Gisela, Blade of Goldnight 3.51/5 on average, across 451 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Gisela, Blade of Goldnight wins, opponents flag the game as salty 65.9% of the time across 226 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Gisela, Blade of Goldnight. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
