Extravagant Replication
Showing 1v1 (duel) data only. 1v1 is a different format from multiplayer Commander, so these numbers are not comparable.
Extravagant Replication
Final zone distribution
130 instancesCommanders that played this card
in tracked games-
1
Aminatou, Veil Piercer
41 decks
-
2
Obeka, Splitter of Seconds
35 decks
-
3
Adrix and Nev, Twincasters
8 decks
-
4
Council of Reeds
6 decks
-
5
Tony Stark // The Invincible Iron Man
6 decks
-
6
Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver
6 decks
-
7
Anhelo, the Painter
5 decks
-
8
Zur, Eternal Schemer
5 decks
-
9
Cynette, Jelly Drover
4 decks
-
10
Lynde, Cheerful Tormentor
4 decks
The "good card" funnel
525 brought · 231 playersOnce cast, 95% of this card is still on the battlefield at game end. This reflects how often it survives removal, not just whether it's a permanent.
Players who cast this card win 23% of the time (n=47) , vs 22% when it never left the library (n=268).
When players drew this card but left it in hand, they won 18% (n=37).
Read this as correlation, not as the card's contribution. Casting a card means you lived long enough to cast it, so this gap widens with mana value across every card we track.
Observed gap +0.7pp; 95% confidence interval -7.0pp to +8.4pp. Correlational, not causal: powerful payoffs also get cast more often in games you are already winning.