Summary
Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 6,694 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (1922–4770) at an Elo of 1,637, ranking #266 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 165301 damage dealt and 0.62 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver's win rate?
How long do winning games with Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver take?
How many decks use Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1718 | Lei | 106 | 54 |
| 2 | 1673 | Wertos | 202 | 72 |
| 3 | 1582 | Vovaaa | 10 | 5 |
| 4 | 1580 | Chase East | 18 | 6 |
| 5 | 1578 | Nimbus | 8 | 5 |
How does this commander win?
When Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver wins, 46.83% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+1.6 pp |
| 2 |
|
+0.3 pp |
| 3 |
|
+0.3 pp |
| 4 |
|
+0.3 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver wins 34.06% of games from position 1 and 15.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver wins 28.6% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver 3.65/5 on average, across 4545 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver wins, opponents flag the game as salty 64.5% of the time across 1980 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.