Jon Irenicus, Shattered One
Global Commander StatsSummary
Jon Irenicus, Shattered One is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,903 recorded Playgroup games, winning 15% of them (298–1605) at an Elo of 1,276, ranking #3808 globally.
Wins average 10 turns, with 4 damage dealt and 0.34 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Jon Irenicus, Shattered One's win rate? ▾
Jon Irenicus, Shattered One has a 15% win rate across 1903 recorded Playgroup games (298 wins, 1605 losses).
How long do winning games with Jon Irenicus, Shattered One take? ▾
Wins with Jon Irenicus, Shattered One take on average 10 turns. Total tracked play time: 19 days.
How many decks use Jon Irenicus, Shattered One? ▾
776 decks list Jon Irenicus, Shattered One as their commander on Playgroup, of which 432 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1550 | Bearfist | 7 | 3 |
| 2 | 1536 | HaHeho | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 1490 | Chochlik | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | 1487 | AbsurdPilgrim | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | 1486 | Skysagit | 1 | 0 |
How does this commander win?
When Jon Irenicus, Shattered One wins, 58.48% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Jon Irenicus, Shattered One wins 18.4% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Jon Irenicus, Shattered One wins 13.22% after 0 mulligans and 100.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Jon Irenicus, Shattered One 3.73/5 on average, across 1317 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Jon Irenicus, Shattered One wins, opponents flag the game as salty 63.0% of the time across 300 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Jon Irenicus, Shattered One. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
