Summary
Gandalf of the Secret Fire is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 469 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (132–335) at an Elo of 1,507, ranking #1979 globally.
Wins average 10 turns, with 4 damage dealt and 0.59 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Gandalf of the Secret Fire's win rate?
How long do winning games with Gandalf of the Secret Fire take?
How many decks use Gandalf of the Secret Fire?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1545 | Mixximo | 17 | 7 |
| 2 | 1540 | Magnus_the_Grixis | 5 | 2 |
| 3 | 1534 | bassdude564 | 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 1534 | Matthew Davison | 2 | 1 |
| 5 | 1524 | dusto66 | 1 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Gandalf of the Secret Fire wins, 53.06% of wins come via non combat damage across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Gandalf of the Secret Fire
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Gandalf of the Secret Fire decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+1.8 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Gandalf of the Secret Fire wins 35.63% of games from position 1 and 19.67% from position 4 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Gandalf of the Secret Fire wins 30.41% after 0 mulligans and 22.22% after 3 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Gandalf of the Secret Fire 3.67/5 on average, across 314 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Gandalf of the Secret Fire wins, opponents flag the game as salty 28.9% of the time across 135 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Gandalf of the Secret Fire. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
