Gandalf of the Secret Fire
Global Commander StatsSummary
Gandalf of the Secret Fire is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 382 recorded Playgroup games, winning 27% of them (106–276) at an Elo of 1,558, ranking #950 globally.
Wins average 11 turns, with 4 damage dealt and 0.62 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Gandalf of the Secret Fire's win rate? ▾
Gandalf of the Secret Fire has a 27% win rate across 382 recorded Playgroup games (106 wins, 276 losses).
How long do winning games with Gandalf of the Secret Fire take? ▾
Wins with Gandalf of the Secret Fire take on average 11 turns. Total tracked play time: 4 days.
How many decks use Gandalf of the Secret Fire? ▾
180 decks list Gandalf of the Secret Fire as their commander on Playgroup, of which 89 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1557 | Mixximo | 16 | 7 |
| 2 | 1540 | Magnus_the_Grixis | 5 | 2 |
| 3 | 1534 | bassdude564 | 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 1515 | kokanas | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 1502 | logiickiil | 4 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Gandalf of the Secret Fire wins, 54.12% of wins come via non combat damage across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Gandalf of the Secret Fire wins 33.33% of games from position 5 and 21.15% from position 4 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Gandalf of the Secret Fire wins 30.39% after 0 mulligans and 28.57% after 3 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Gandalf of the Secret Fire 3.65/5 on average, across 258 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Gandalf of the Secret Fire wins, opponents flag the game as salty 60.6% of the time across 109 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Gandalf of the Secret Fire. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
