Rashmi, Eternities Crafter
Global Commander StatsSummary
Rashmi, Eternities Crafter is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 484 recorded Playgroup games, winning 37% of them (180–304) at an Elo of 1,513, ranking #1594 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 6 damage dealt and 0.7 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Rashmi, Eternities Crafter's win rate? ▾
Rashmi, Eternities Crafter has a 37% win rate across 484 recorded Playgroup games (180 wins, 304 losses).
How long do winning games with Rashmi, Eternities Crafter take? ▾
Wins with Rashmi, Eternities Crafter take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 5 days.
How many decks use Rashmi, Eternities Crafter? ▾
148 decks list Rashmi, Eternities Crafter as their commander on Playgroup, of which 89 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1814 | Loyd Huhn | 50 | 33 |
| 2 | 1579 | VettePette | 82 | 47 |
| 3 | 1561 | eli.lamborn | 9 | 4 |
| 4 | 1535 | PineyBones | 3 | 2 |
| 5 | 1527 | ManaMafia | 2 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Rashmi, Eternities Crafter wins, 70.27% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Rashmi, Eternities Crafter wins 50.0% of games from position 1 and 18.18% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Rashmi, Eternities Crafter wins 41.74% after 0 mulligans and 25.0% after 3 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Rashmi, Eternities Crafter 3.68/5 on average, across 361 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Rashmi, Eternities Crafter wins, opponents flag the game as salty 77.5% of the time across 182 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Rashmi, Eternities Crafter. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
