Summary
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,410 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (404–1005) at an Elo of 1,606, ranking #481 globally.
Wins average 8 turns, with 29 damage dealt and 0.65 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma's win rate?
How long do winning games with Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma take?
How many decks use Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1789 | Panface | 34 | 20 |
| 2 | 1592 | Bustino | 42 | 9 |
| 3 | 1548 | JollyJeskai | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1547 | BigZeeNation | 3 | 2 |
| 5 | 1536 | Yam Bandit | 1 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma wins, 86.36% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+3.5 pp |
| 2 |
|
+3.1 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma wins 34.84% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma wins 28.4% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 3.71/5 on average, across 1043 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma wins, opponents flag the game as salty 72.6% of the time across 419 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
