Summary
Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,567 recorded Playgroup games, winning 34% of them (544–1022) at an Elo of 1,568, ranking #870 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 162744 damage dealt and 0.77 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher's win rate?
How long do winning games with Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher take?
How many decks use Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1637 | Magnus_the_Grixis | 20 | 11 |
| 2 | 1607 | jimbonator | 7 | 5 |
| 3 | 1574 | Franz | 6 | 4 |
| 4 | 1565 | Klegbert | 10 | 4 |
| 5 | 1565 | Ethan Daughtry | 21 | 7 |
How does this commander win?
When Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher wins, 38.61% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+16.9 pp |
| 2 |
|
+5.3 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher wins 41.74% of games from position 1 and 20.59% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher wins 36.84% after 0 mulligans and 50.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher 3.5/5 on average, across 984 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher wins, opponents flag the game as salty 58.9% of the time across 559 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Carmen, Cruel Skymarcher. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.