Summary
Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,455 recorded Playgroup games, winning 30% of them (448–995) at an Elo of 1,559, ranking #1011 globally.
Wins average 8 turns, with 7 damage dealt and 0.72 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief's win rate?
How long do winning games with Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief take?
How many decks use Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1607 | pedromiranda | 14 | 7 |
| 2 | 1587 | Average Joe_e | 7 | 4 |
| 3 | 1566 | J44 | 11 | 5 |
| 4 | 1547 | Tiago Silveira | 6 | 2 |
| 5 | 1544 | TheOneDrRandom | 3 | 2 |
How does this commander win?
When Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief wins, 50.18% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+2.2 pp |
| 2 |
|
+0.4 pp |
| 3 |
|
+0.1 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief wins 40.05% of games from position 1 and 17.21% from position 4 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief wins 29.08% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief 3.65/5 on average, across 970 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief wins, opponents flag the game as salty 35.3% of the time across 456 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.