Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant
Global Commander StatsSummary
Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 232 recorded Playgroup games, winning 27% of them (63–169) at an Elo of 1,615, ranking #396 globally.
Wins average 8 turns, with 8 damage dealt and 0.47 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant's win rate? ▾
Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant has a 27% win rate across 232 recorded Playgroup games (63 wins, 169 losses).
How long do winning games with Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant take? ▾
Wins with Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant take on average 8 turns. Total tracked play time: 2 days.
How many decks use Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant? ▾
132 decks list Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant as their commander on Playgroup, of which 50 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1597 | Rob | 9 | 6 |
| 2 | 1512 | Wordy-Yacht-30 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 1488 | Bojangles | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | 1476 | Dunne | 7 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant wins, 27.91% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant wins 50.0% of games from position 5 and 15.63% from position 4 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant wins 25.0% after 0 mulligans and 100.0% after 3 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant 3.64/5 on average, across 118 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant wins, opponents flag the game as salty 43.1% of the time across 65 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.