Summary
Agatha of the Vile Cauldron is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,141 recorded Playgroup games, winning 27% of them (318–816) at an Elo of 1,647, ranking #247 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 75 damage dealt and 0.67 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Agatha of the Vile Cauldron's win rate?
How long do winning games with Agatha of the Vile Cauldron take?
How many decks use Agatha of the Vile Cauldron?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1603 | Albux | 6 | 4 |
| 2 | 1552 | Guilherme Ribeiro | 4 | 3 |
| 3 | 1548 | DonutFuton | 4 | 2 |
| 4 | 1545 | LewtGuru | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 1536 | Hemluck | 1 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Agatha of the Vile Cauldron wins, 47.93% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Agatha of the Vile Cauldron
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Agatha of the Vile Cauldron decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+1.6 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Agatha of the Vile Cauldron wins 33.33% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Agatha of the Vile Cauldron wins 26.75% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Agatha of the Vile Cauldron 3.61/5 on average, across 729 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Agatha of the Vile Cauldron wins, opponents flag the game as salty 33.0% of the time across 321 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Agatha of the Vile Cauldron. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
