Agatha of the Vile Cauldron
Global Commander StatsSummary
Agatha of the Vile Cauldron is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 980 recorded Playgroup games, winning 27% of them (274–706) at an Elo of 1,534, ranking #1286 globally.
Wins average 8 turns, with 85 damage dealt and 0.69 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Agatha of the Vile Cauldron's win rate? ▾
Agatha of the Vile Cauldron has a 27% win rate across 980 recorded Playgroup games (274 wins, 706 losses).
How long do winning games with Agatha of the Vile Cauldron take? ▾
Wins with Agatha of the Vile Cauldron take on average 8 turns. Total tracked play time: 27 days.
How many decks use Agatha of the Vile Cauldron? ▾
315 decks list Agatha of the Vile Cauldron as their commander on Playgroup, of which 174 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1529 | Albux | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 1518 | azza1695 | 8 | 3 |
| 3 | 1510 | Jeffpool | 54 | 19 |
| 4 | 1500 | Delirioues | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | 1500 | Joel Carvalho | 2 | 0 |
How does this commander win?
When Agatha of the Vile Cauldron wins, 45.36% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Agatha of the Vile Cauldron wins 34.5% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Agatha of the Vile Cauldron wins 27.12% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Agatha of the Vile Cauldron 3.6/5 on average, across 630 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Agatha of the Vile Cauldron wins, opponents flag the game as salty 64.3% of the time across 277 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Agatha of the Vile Cauldron. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
