Felisa, Fang of Silverquill
Global Commander StatsSummary
Felisa, Fang of Silverquill is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 431 recorded Playgroup games, winning 29% of them (125–306) at an Elo of 1,559, ranking #951 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 5 damage dealt and 0.69 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Felisa, Fang of Silverquill's win rate? ▾
Felisa, Fang of Silverquill has a 29% win rate across 431 recorded Playgroup games (125 wins, 306 losses).
How long do winning games with Felisa, Fang of Silverquill take? ▾
Wins with Felisa, Fang of Silverquill take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 5 days.
How many decks use Felisa, Fang of Silverquill? ▾
155 decks list Felisa, Fang of Silverquill as their commander on Playgroup, of which 91 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1617 | Cameron | 7 | 5 |
| 2 | 1563 | Besovti | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 1523 | TappingTimmyTurner | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 1512 | jonespaulr | 7 | 2 |
| 5 | 1511 | kimifly | 3 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Felisa, Fang of Silverquill wins, 76.67% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Felisa, Fang of Silverquill wins 40.0% of games from position 5 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Felisa, Fang of Silverquill wins 28.9% after 0 mulligans and 25.0% after 3 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Felisa, Fang of Silverquill 3.73/5 on average, across 249 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Felisa, Fang of Silverquill wins, opponents flag the game as salty 60.9% of the time across 133 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Felisa, Fang of Silverquill. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
