Hamza, Guardian of Arashin
Global Commander StatsSummary
Hamza, Guardian of Arashin is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,016 recorded Playgroup games, winning 21% of them (219–797) at an Elo of 1,394, ranking #3729 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 9 damage dealt and 0.49 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Hamza, Guardian of Arashin's win rate? ▾
Hamza, Guardian of Arashin has a 21% win rate across 1016 recorded Playgroup games (219 wins, 797 losses).
How long do winning games with Hamza, Guardian of Arashin take? ▾
Wins with Hamza, Guardian of Arashin take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 11 days.
How many decks use Hamza, Guardian of Arashin? ▾
368 decks list Hamza, Guardian of Arashin as their commander on Playgroup, of which 200 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1552 | Jobblamee | 10 | 4 |
| 2 | 1536 | Leica64 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 1525 | jarhead399 | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 1491 | Maran | 27 | 6 |
| 5 | 1475 | Mr. Falcon | 6 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Hamza, Guardian of Arashin wins, 86.16% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Hamza, Guardian of Arashin wins 31.97% of games from position 1 and 7.86% from position 4 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Hamza, Guardian of Arashin wins 21.34% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 4 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Hamza, Guardian of Arashin 3.58/5 on average, across 711 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Hamza, Guardian of Arashin wins, opponents flag the game as salty 72.6% of the time across 223 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Hamza, Guardian of Arashin. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
