Summary
Osgir, the Reconstructor is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,601 recorded Playgroup games, winning 26% of them (423–1171) at an Elo of 1,432, ranking #4716 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 337345 damage dealt and 0.53 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Osgir, the Reconstructor's win rate?
How long do winning games with Osgir, the Reconstructor take?
How many decks use Osgir, the Reconstructor?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1548 | Derek Vasconcelos | 4 | 2 |
| 2 | 1536 | TreyBone0 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 1530 | MarkyMark | 5 | 3 |
| 4 | 1524 | stab388 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 1524 | Dommunism | 1 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Osgir, the Reconstructor wins, 57.49% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Osgir, the Reconstructor
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Osgir, the Reconstructor decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+1.6 pp |
| 2 |
|
+1.4 pp |
| 3 |
|
+0.9 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Osgir, the Reconstructor wins 66.67% of games from position 6 and 12.5% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Osgir, the Reconstructor wins 27.28% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Osgir, the Reconstructor 3.69/5 on average, across 1075 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Osgir, the Reconstructor wins, opponents flag the game as salty 39.7% of the time across 433 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Osgir, the Reconstructor. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
