Commander

Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar

Global commander stats

All Rakdos commanders

152 Wins

422 Losses

Playtest a community deck

Overview

Summary

Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 575 recorded Playgroup games, winning 26% of them (152–422) at an Elo of 1,482, ranking #3682 globally.

Wins average 9 turns, with 4 damage dealt and 0.56 player kills per game on average.

Last full refresh 30 Aug 2026

Sources Scryfall · EDHREC · JSON API

Frequently Asked

What is Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar's win rate?

Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar has a 26% win rate across 575 recorded Playgroup games (152 wins, 422 losses).

How long do winning games with Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar take?

Wins with Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 8 days.

How many decks use Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar?

307 decks list Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar as their commander on Playgroup, of which 161 have played at least one recorded game.

Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar Magic: The Gathering commander card art

Buy on TCGplayer

Global rank

3682

Wins by turn (avg.)

Elo rating

1482

Trend

Global Elo trend

Trend

Commander popularity trend

Averages

Misc. stats

Average damage per game 4

Average commander damage per game 3

Average poison counters given per game 1

Average kills per game 0.56

Average turn length 2 minutes

No. decks for this commander 307

No. decks with at least one game for this commander 161

No. games played with this commander 575

Total hours played 8 days

Community

Top 5 public decks

Rank	Elo	User	Games	Wins	Winrate
1	1557	NotMark	3	2	67 %
2	1547	Matt Mansfield	20	8	40 %
3	1547	mcmomo	1	1	100 %
4	1547	CinnamonSynonyms	2	2	100 %
5	1533	Hofisco	5	3	60 %

Outcomes

How does this commander win?

When Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar wins, 47.86% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.

Combat

47.86%

Non Combat Damage

40.17%

Combo

10.26%

Mill

1.71%

Avg win turn 9.0 based on 154 wins with recorded turn counts

Measured

Staples that win games for Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar

Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar decks that leave them out.

+13.8 pp

Top card: Experimental Confectioner

#	Card	Lift Win-rate lift	Games
1	Experimental Confectioner 32 games	+13.8 pp	32
2	Trading Post Signature build 35 games · Signature build	+7.3 pp	35
3	Rapacious Guest 43 games	+7.2 pp	43
4	Terminal Agony Signature build 33 games · Signature build	+4.6 pp	33
5	Witch's Oven 46 games	+4.4 pp	46
6	Cauldron Familiar 37 games	+3.6 pp	37
7	Mirkwood Bats Signature build 35 games · Signature build	+2.1 pp	35
8	Bone Miser 39 games	+1.3 pp	39
9	Arcane Signet Signature build 31 games · Signature build	+1.0 pp	31

Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured

Table position

Does seating order matter?

Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar wins 29.94% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.

Seat 1

29.94% n=157

Seat 2

25.47% n=161

Seat 3

18.84% n=138

Seat 4

24.29% n=70

Seat 5

28.57% n=7

Seat 6

0.0% n=1

Opening hands

Do mulligans hurt this commander?

Across tracked games, Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar wins 23.39% after 0 mulligans and 33.33% after 4 mulligans.

0 mulligans

23.39% n=248

1 mulligan

23.86% n=88

2 mulligans

20.0% n=25

3 mulligans

50.0% n=4

4 mulligans

33.33% n=3

Player reports

How do players rate games with this commander?

Pilot rating

Pilots rate their own games with Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar 3.83/5 on average, across 449 self-reports.

3.83 / 5

🧂

Opponent salt

When Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar wins, opponents flag the game as salty 76.1% of the time across 155 tracked wins.

76.1 \%

Head to head

Best and worst matchups

Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.