Summary
Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 330 recorded Playgroup games, winning 36% of them (120–202) at an Elo of 1,607, ranking #517 globally.
Wins average 7 turns, with 8 damage dealt and 0.83 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms's win rate?
How long do winning games with Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms take?
How many decks use Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1577 | Bolinbear | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 1569 | 43hailranger | 10 | 4 |
| 3 | 1569 | Surfing Llama | 5 | 3 |
| 4 | 1545 | Dodo2109 | 3 | 2 |
| 5 | 1537 | binaryviking | 3 | 3 |
How does this commander win?
When Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms wins, 66.2% of wins come via commander damage across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+2.6 pp |
| 2 |
|
+0.6 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms wins 66.67% of games from position 5 and 23.21% from position 4 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms wins 37.08% after 0 mulligans and 50.0% after 3 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms 3.86/5 on average, across 183 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms wins, opponents flag the game as salty 29.5% of the time across 122 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Gilgamesh, Master-at-Arms. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
