Data-Backed · Win Rates
Selesnya Commanders
Selesnya commanders have a 23.65% win rate across 30,174 games tracked in the last 365 days on Playgroup.gg, below the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
85
Ranked
30,174
Games
Win Rate
23.65%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
30,174
Last 365 Days
Avg Game Length
1h 54m
8.9 rounds
Commanders
85
With 40+ games
Win Conditions
Selesnya commanders most commonly win through Combat (71.1% of wins) across 30,174 tracked games.
Combat
71.1%
Commander Damage
15.3%
Alternative
5.2%
Non Combat Damage
4.1%
Combo
3.1%
Poison
0.6%
Mill
0.5%
Game Concentration
13 commanders account for 50% of all Selesnya games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
13
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
148 of 178 Selesnya commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
83.1%
Coverage
148 played
178 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Selesnya Commanders by Win Rate
85
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 36.69% | 62 | NEW | |
| 2 | S | 35.79% | 498 | ~ | |
| 3 | S | 35.5% | 1105 | ▲+5.23% | |
| 4 | A | 34.8% | 148 | ▼-12.05% | |
| 5 | A | 32.08% | 53 | NEW | |
| 6 | A | 31.28% | 557 | ~ | |
| 7 | B | 29.23% | 71 | ▲+6.4% | |
| 8 | B | 28.99% | 144 | ▲+4.13% | |
| 9 | B | 28.88% | 480 | ~ | |
| 10 | B | 28.85% | 104 | ▲+10.79% | |
| 11 | B | 28.32% | 361 | ~ | |
| 12 | B | 27.79% | 376 | ▲+8.2% | |
| 13 | B | 27.53% | 99 | ▲+10.3% | |
| 14 | B | 27.02% | 1063 | NEW | |
| 15 | B | 26.65% | 91 | NEW | |
| 16 | B | 26.63% | 138 | ▼-5.87% | |
| 17 | B | 26.57% | 270 | ▲+5.03% | |
| 18 | B | 26.51% | 83 | ▲+14.76% | |
| 19 | B | 26.3% | 135 | ~ | |
| 20 | B | 26.15% | 65 | NEW | |
| 21 | B | 25.97% | 77 | ▲+3.01% | |
| 22 | B | 25.9% | 375 | ~ | |
| 23 | B | 25.67% | 261 | ▼-8.77% | |
| 24 | B | 25.29% | 263 | ~ | |
| 25 | B | 24.97% | 388 | ~ | |
| 26 | B | 24.73% | 638 | ~ | |
| 27 | B | 24.38% | 240 | ~ | |
| 28 | B | 24.28% | 364 | ▼-4.29% | |
| 29 | B | 24.09% | 1500 | ~ | |
| 30 | B | 24.02% | 242 | NEW | |
| 31 | B | 23.97% | 328 | ▼-3.23% | |
| 32 | B | 23.85% | 818 | ~ | |
| 33 | B | 23.84% | 949 | ~ | |
| 34 | B | 23.84% | 43 | ▼-6.72% | |
| 35 | B | 23.78% | 41 | NEW | |
| 36 | B | 23.78% | 41 | ▼-10.97% | |
| 37 | B | 23.71% | 406 | ▼-5.42% | |
| 38 | B | 23.59% | 249 | ▼-7.52% | |
| 39 | B | 23.46% | 171 | ~ | |
| 40 | B | 23.4% | 141 | ▲+6.09% | |
| 41 | B | 23.34% | 595 | NEW | |
| 42 | B | 23.33% | 90 | ~ | |
| 43 | B | 23.18% | 247 | ~ | |
| 44 | B | 23.12% | 2553 | NEW | |
| 45 | B | 23.11% | 1436 | ~ | |
| 46 | C | 22.96% | 801 | ~ | |
| 47 | C | 22.88% | 59 | ▲+3.14% | |
| 48 | C | 22.67% | 301 | ~ | |
| 49 | C | 22.64% | 222 | ~ | |
| 50 | C | 22.61% | 324 | ~ | |
| 51 | C | 22.3% | 111 | NEW | |
| 52 | C | 22.21% | 2313 | ~ | |
| 53 | C | 21.82% | 122 | NEW | |
| 54 | C | 21.72% | 160 | ▲+8.84% | |
| 55 | C | 21.43% | 680 | ~ | |
| 56 | C | 21.32% | 68 | ~ | |
| 57 | C | 21.05% | 133 | ▼-3.38% | |
| 58 | C | 20.74% | 370 | ▼-3.2% | |
| 59 | C | 20.65% | 732 | ▼-4.69% | |
| 60 | C | 20.6% | 250 | ▲+5.54% | |
| 61 | C | 20.47% | 160 | NEW | |
| 62 | C | 20.47% | 386 | ▼-6.24% | |
| 63 | C | 20.44% | 137 | ▼-4.21% | |
| 64 | C | 20.15% | 103 | ▲+9.07% | |
| 65 | C | 20.06% | 86 | ~ | |
| 66 | C | 19.7% | 132 | ~ | |
| 67 | C | 19.64% | 42 | NEW | |
| 68 | C | 19.6% | 88 | ▼-3.83% | |
| 69 | C | 19.56% | 354 | ~ | |
| 70 | C | 19.55% | 55 | NEW | |
| 71 | C | 19.37% | 111 | NEW | |
| 72 | C | 19.05% | 63 | NEW | |
| 73 | C | 19.03% | 44 | NEW | |
| 74 | C | 18.91% | 314 | ▼-11.23% | |
| 75 | C | 18.52% | 108 | ▲+3.76% | |
| 76 | C | 18.48% | 1358 | ▼-3.19% | |
| 77 | C | 18.4% | 72 | ▼-13.71% | |
| 78 | C | 18.04% | 573 | ~ | |
| 79 | D | 17.92% | 120 | ▼-3.75% | |
| 80 | D | 17.81% | 73 | NEW | |
| 81 | D | 17.75% | 69 | ▼-6.31% | |
| 82 | D | 16.96% | 84 | ▼-3.15% | |
| 83 | D | 16.49% | 457 | ~ | |
| 84 | D | 16.38% | 58 | NEW | |
| 85 | D | 16.36% | 55 | ▲+3.18% |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Selesnya
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Selesnya commanders?
Selesnya commanders have a 23.65% win rate across 30,174 tracked casual Commander games in the last 365 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Selesnya commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 85 Selesnya commanders with at least 40 recorded games and at least 7 distinct registered pilots in the last 365 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Selesnya commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Selesnya data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 365 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: