Trostani, Selesnya's Voice
Global Commander StatsSummary
Trostani, Selesnya's Voice is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,161 recorded Playgroup games, winning 26% of them (302–859) at an Elo of 1,493, ranking #2924 globally.
Wins average 10 turns, with 16 damage dealt and 0.56 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Trostani, Selesnya's Voice's win rate? ▾
Trostani, Selesnya's Voice has a 26% win rate across 1161 recorded Playgroup games (302 wins, 859 losses).
How long do winning games with Trostani, Selesnya's Voice take? ▾
Wins with Trostani, Selesnya's Voice take on average 10 turns. Total tracked play time: about 1 month.
How many decks use Trostani, Selesnya's Voice? ▾
442 decks list Trostani, Selesnya's Voice as their commander on Playgroup, of which 222 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1640 | Lucas | 8 | 6 |
| 2 | 1581 | Recorbbo | 9 | 5 |
| 3 | 1576 | sswe | 3 | 2 |
| 4 | 1527 | HawksinE | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 1513 | QuePasaMyFriend | 15 | 6 |
How does this commander win?
When Trostani, Selesnya's Voice wins, 81.09% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Trostani, Selesnya's Voice wins 32.36% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Trostani, Selesnya's Voice wins 30.02% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Trostani, Selesnya's Voice 3.61/5 on average, across 686 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Trostani, Selesnya's Voice wins, opponents flag the game as salty 52.8% of the time across 316 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Trostani, Selesnya's Voice. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
