Summary
Gargos, Vicious Watcher is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,587 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (455–1129) at an Elo of 1,492, ranking #3368 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 543989 damage dealt and 0.63 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Gargos, Vicious Watcher's win rate?
How long do winning games with Gargos, Vicious Watcher take?
How many decks use Gargos, Vicious Watcher?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1567 | timbolimbo | 15 | 6 |
| 2 | 1551 | Kalvin | 22 | 7 |
| 3 | 1545 | A BoxofCheezits | 13 | 5 |
| 4 | 1535 | VidarsDagger | 2 | 2 |
| 5 | 1534 | Goblin Child | 1 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Gargos, Vicious Watcher wins, 80.0% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Gargos, Vicious Watcher
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Gargos, Vicious Watcher decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+5.8 pp |
| 2 |
|
+4.8 pp |
| 3 |
|
+1.0 pp |
| 4 |
|
+0.2 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Gargos, Vicious Watcher wins 34.92% of games from position 1 and 16.28% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Gargos, Vicious Watcher wins 27.99% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Gargos, Vicious Watcher 3.6/5 on average, across 1226 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Gargos, Vicious Watcher wins, opponents flag the game as salty 76.9% of the time across 467 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Gargos, Vicious Watcher. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
