Summary
Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 388 recorded Playgroup games, winning 25% of them (97–288) at an Elo of 1,488, ranking #3689 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 5 damage dealt and 0.54 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp's win rate?
How long do winning games with Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp take?
How many decks use Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1525 | Ajejebra90 | 4 | 2 |
| 2 | 1514 | IndecisiveOlive | 9 | 4 |
| 3 | 1508 | ArcaneNexus | 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 1500 | Kudniry | 2 | 0 |
| 5 | 1499 | NoirGalaxies | 6 | 2 |
How does this commander win?
When Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp wins, 44.74% of wins come via commander damage across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+4.5 pp |
| 2 |
|
+4.0 pp |
| 3 |
|
+2.0 pp |
| 4 |
|
+1.3 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp wins 32.06% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp wins 19.19% after 0 mulligans and 33.33% after 3 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp 3.71/5 on average, across 302 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp wins, opponents flag the game as salty 85.0% of the time across 100 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
