Summary
Koma, Cosmos Serpent is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,824 recorded Playgroup games, winning 34% of them (632–1159) at an Elo of 1,603, ranking #561 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 17 damage dealt and 0.74 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Koma, Cosmos Serpent's win rate?
How long do winning games with Koma, Cosmos Serpent take?
How many decks use Koma, Cosmos Serpent?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1670 | Aedricthebard | 14 | 8 |
| 2 | 1588 | Ivan Chavez | 8 | 4 |
| 3 | 1580 | Janjo | 10 | 4 |
| 4 | 1555 | Eddie Stardust | 10 | 4 |
| 5 | 1552 | FrostCzar | 3 | 2 |
How does this commander win?
When Koma, Cosmos Serpent wins, 84.48% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Koma, Cosmos Serpent
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Koma, Cosmos Serpent decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+7.3 pp |
| 2 |
|
+4.0 pp |
| 3 |
|
+3.1 pp |
| 4 |
|
+1.4 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Koma, Cosmos Serpent wins 41.74% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Koma, Cosmos Serpent wins 34.91% after 0 mulligans and 50.0% after 4 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Koma, Cosmos Serpent 3.59/5 on average, across 1197 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Koma, Cosmos Serpent wins, opponents flag the game as salty 39.0% of the time across 651 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Koma, Cosmos Serpent. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
