Data-Backed · Win Rates
Boros Commanders
Boros commanders have a 27.77% win rate across 9,561 games tracked in the last 90 days on Playgroup.gg, above the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
85
Ranked
9,561
Games
Win Rate
27.77%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
9,561
Last 90 Days
Avg Game Length
2h 11m
8.9 rounds
Commanders
85
With 15+ games
Win Conditions
Boros commanders most commonly win through Combat (64.9% of wins) across 9,561 tracked games.
Combat
64.9%
Non Combat Damage
14.9%
Commander Damage
12.7%
Alternative
4.3%
Combo
2.5%
Poison
0.3%
Mill
0.3%
Game Concentration
9 commanders account for 50% of all Boros games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
9
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
137 of 175 Boros commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
78.3%
Coverage
137 played
175 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Boros Commanders by Win Rate
85
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 52.08% | 24 | NEW | |
| 2 | S | 45.0% | 20 | ▲+17.37% | |
| 3 | S | 39.06% | 32 | ▲+9.06% | |
| 4 | S | 38.6% | 57 | ▼-3.63% | |
| 5 | S | 36.61% | 28 | ▲+4.11% | |
| 6 | S | 35.27% | 146 | ~ | |
| 7 | A | 34.62% | 78 | ▲+16.7% | |
| 8 | A | 33.93% | 28 | NEW | |
| 9 | A | 33.87% | 2250 | ▼-8.11% | |
| 10 | A | 32.5% | 20 | NEW | |
| 11 | A | 31.89% | 323 | ▼-4.9% | |
| 12 | A | 31.0% | 75 | ~ | |
| 13 | A | 30.65% | 31 | ▲+6.97% | |
| 14 | A | 30.62% | 129 | NEW | |
| 15 | A | 30.31% | 80 | ▲+7.14% | |
| 16 | A | 30.23% | 43 | ▲+7.15% | |
| 17 | A | 30.21% | 24 | NEW | |
| 18 | B | 29.8% | 448 | ▼-4.95% | |
| 19 | B | 29.3% | 285 | ▲+5.82% | |
| 20 | B | 28.92% | 51 | ▲+5.77% | |
| 21 | B | 28.57% | 28 | ▲+4.76% | |
| 22 | B | 28.51% | 499 | ▲+3.38% | |
| 23 | B | 28.5% | 50 | ~ | |
| 24 | B | 28.49% | 93 | ~ | |
| 25 | B | 28.27% | 191 | ▼-4.25% | |
| 26 | B | 27.63% | 38 | ▲+12.15% | |
| 27 | B | 27.59% | 29 | ▲+12.14% | |
| 28 | B | 27.46% | 254 | ▼-3.79% | |
| 29 | B | 27.38% | 21 | ▲+7.07% | |
| 30 | B | 27.3% | 76 | ▼-6.59% | |
| 31 | B | 27.27% | 22 | ▲+27.27% | |
| 32 | B | 27.17% | 23 | ▼-17.83% | |
| 33 | B | 27.16% | 81 | ~ | |
| 34 | B | 27.1% | 262 | ~ | |
| 35 | B | 26.98% | 101 | ▲+9.19% | |
| 36 | B | 26.85% | 418 | ▲+3.22% | |
| 37 | B | 26.83% | 219 | ▼-5.05% | |
| 38 | B | 26.25% | 20 | NEW | |
| 39 | B | 26.19% | 21 | NEW | |
| 40 | B | 26.14% | 22 | ~ | |
| 41 | B | 25.84% | 149 | ▼-3.04% | |
| 42 | B | 25.78% | 64 | ▼-10.4% | |
| 43 | B | 25.47% | 53 | ▼-3.1% | |
| 44 | B | 25.35% | 71 | ▲+4.42% | |
| 45 | B | 25.0% | 22 | NEW | |
| 46 | B | 25.0% | 25 | ▲+5.3% | |
| 47 | B | 25.0% | 60 | ▼-11.96% | |
| 48 | B | 24.74% | 98 | ~ | |
| 49 | B | 24.73% | 183 | ~ | |
| 50 | B | 24.55% | 111 | ▼-4.2% | |
| 51 | B | 24.47% | 47 | ~ | |
| 52 | B | 24.26% | 34 | NEW | |
| 53 | B | 24.17% | 30 | NEW | |
| 54 | B | 23.96% | 24 | ▼-13.92% | |
| 55 | B | 23.41% | 126 | ▲+6.74% | |
| 56 | B | 23.28% | 29 | ~ | |
| 57 | B | 23.09% | 118 | ▲+4.2% | |
| 58 | B | 23.04% | 51 | ▲+4.77% | |
| 59 | C | 22.79% | 34 | ▼-26.12% | |
| 60 | C | 22.71% | 120 | ▼-10.55% | |
| 61 | C | 22.62% | 21 | ▲+6.62% | |
| 62 | C | 21.51% | 43 | ▼-14.47% | |
| 63 | C | 21.34% | 82 | ▼-3.26% | |
| 64 | C | 21.32% | 34 | ~ | |
| 65 | C | 20.83% | 48 | NEW | |
| 66 | C | 20.14% | 36 | ▼-12.0% | |
| 67 | C | 20.0% | 50 | ▼-5.6% | |
| 68 | C | 19.79% | 24 | ▼-20.21% | |
| 69 | C | 19.07% | 59 | ▼-11.43% | |
| 70 | C | 19.05% | 63 | ▲+4.72% | |
| 71 | C | 19.03% | 352 | ~ | |
| 72 | C | 18.75% | 32 | ▲+8.41% | |
| 73 | C | 18.52% | 27 | ▲+3.75% | |
| 74 | C | 18.27% | 52 | ▼-4.23% | |
| 75 | D | 17.19% | 16 | ▼-31.88% | |
| 76 | D | 17.15% | 207 | ▼-4.91% | |
| 77 | D | 16.84% | 49 | ▲+6.37% | |
| 78 | D | 16.67% | 18 | ▲+7.19% | |
| 79 | D | 16.49% | 47 | NEW | |
| 80 | D | 14.66% | 29 | NEW | |
| 81 | D | 13.89% | 54 | ▲+10.76% | |
| 82 | D | 12.5% | 60 | ▼-5.23% | |
| 83 | D | 12.5% | 16 | ▼-24.34% | |
| 84 | D | 10.48% | 31 | NEW | |
| 85 | D | 6.25% | 16 | NEW |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Boros
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Boros commanders?
Boros commanders have a 27.77% win rate across 9,561 tracked casual Commander games in the last 90 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Boros commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 85 Boros commanders with at least 15 recorded games and at least 4 distinct registered pilots in the last 90 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Boros commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Boros data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 90 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: