Summary
Mabel, Heir to Cragflame is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,147 recorded Playgroup games, winning 26% of them (299–827) at an Elo of 1,480, ranking #3865 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 6 damage dealt and 0.56 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Mabel, Heir to Cragflame's win rate?
How long do winning games with Mabel, Heir to Cragflame take?
How many decks use Mabel, Heir to Cragflame?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1535 | Swatchnip | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1526 | ArcaneNexus | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 1524 | MarsiQueen_00 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1523 | WildCard | 2 | 2 |
| 5 | 1521 | DokToxik | 2 | 2 |
How does this commander win?
When Mabel, Heir to Cragflame wins, 57.26% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Mabel, Heir to Cragflame
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Mabel, Heir to Cragflame decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+11.3 pp |
| 2 |
|
+10.3 pp |
| 3 |
|
+5.4 pp |
| 4 |
|
+0.9 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Mabel, Heir to Cragflame wins 33.38% of games from position 1 and 10.53% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Mabel, Heir to Cragflame wins 25.09% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Mabel, Heir to Cragflame 3.81/5 on average, across 829 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Mabel, Heir to Cragflame wins, opponents flag the game as salty 70.3% of the time across 316 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Mabel, Heir to Cragflame. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
