Summary
Lightning, Army of One is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 2,000 recorded Playgroup games, winning 27% of them (551–1426) at an Elo of 1,572, ranking #838 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 8 damage dealt and 0.63 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Lightning, Army of One's win rate?
How long do winning games with Lightning, Army of One take?
How many decks use Lightning, Army of One?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1669 | Thoril Visalla | 6 | 6 |
| 2 | 1604 | BiscuitStick | 5 | 4 |
| 3 | 1592 | Francisco López García | 20 | 7 |
| 4 | 1586 | Michael Tucker | 3 | 3 |
| 5 | 1565 | Rocxam_95 | 3 | 2 |
How does this commander win?
When Lightning, Army of One wins, 46.96% of wins come via commander damage across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Lightning, Army of One
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Lightning, Army of One decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+2.7 pp |
| 2 |
|
+2.5 pp |
| 3 |
|
+0.5 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Lightning, Army of One wins 33.68% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Lightning, Army of One wins 28.06% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Lightning, Army of One 3.76/5 on average, across 1330 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Lightning, Army of One wins, opponents flag the game as salty 68.0% of the time across 571 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Lightning, Army of One. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
