Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor
Global Commander StatsSummary
Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,791 recorded Playgroup games, winning 27% of them (501–1290) at an Elo of 1,550, ranking #1038 globally.
Wins average 11 turns, with 4 damage dealt and 0.53 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor's win rate? ▾
Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor has a 27% win rate across 1791 recorded Playgroup games (501 wins, 1290 losses).
How long do winning games with Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor take? ▾
Wins with Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor take on average 11 turns. Total tracked play time: 24 days.
How many decks use Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor? ▾
633 decks list Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor as their commander on Playgroup, of which 422 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1556 | DigitDaemon | 3 | 2 |
| 2 | 1544 | faeriegirl | 4 | 1 |
| 3 | 1544 | Drajul | 15 | 7 |
| 4 | 1532 | PedroLobo | 14 | 4 |
| 5 | 1524 | Jasmine Sellmo | 2 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor wins, 84.97% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor wins 34.16% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor wins 27.62% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 4 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor 3.64/5 on average, across 1187 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor wins, opponents flag the game as salty 64.1% of the time across 521 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
