Summary
Ezuri, Claw of Progress is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,828 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (519–1306) at an Elo of 1,455, ranking #4307 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 383906 damage dealt and 0.62 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Ezuri, Claw of Progress's win rate?
How long do winning games with Ezuri, Claw of Progress take?
How many decks use Ezuri, Claw of Progress?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1608 | Thalioden | 16 | 11 |
| 2 | 1534 | Foolbert | 10 | 3 |
| 3 | 1531 | Acyre | 5 | 2 |
| 4 | 1522 | MetalRelic | 5 | 2 |
| 5 | 1521 | Kairopteran | 39 | 9 |
How does this commander win?
When Ezuri, Claw of Progress wins, 66.48% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Ezuri, Claw of Progress
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Ezuri, Claw of Progress decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+5.9 pp |
| 2 |
|
+5.6 pp |
| 3 |
|
+5.5 pp |
| 4 |
|
+0.0 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Ezuri, Claw of Progress wins 36.26% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Ezuri, Claw of Progress wins 28.15% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Ezuri, Claw of Progress 3.78/5 on average, across 1250 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Ezuri, Claw of Progress wins, opponents flag the game as salty 68.6% of the time across 532 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Ezuri, Claw of Progress. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
