Najeela, the Blade-Blossom
Global Commander StatsSummary
Najeela, the Blade-Blossom is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 2,451 recorded Playgroup games, winning 35% of them (871–1580) at an Elo of 1,624, ranking #339 globally.
Wins average 7 turns, with 10 damage dealt and 0.69 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Najeela, the Blade-Blossom's win rate? ▾
Najeela, the Blade-Blossom has a 35% win rate across 2451 recorded Playgroup games (871 wins, 1580 losses).
How long do winning games with Najeela, the Blade-Blossom take? ▾
Wins with Najeela, the Blade-Blossom take on average 7 turns. Total tracked play time: 14 days.
How many decks use Najeela, the Blade-Blossom? ▾
829 decks list Najeela, the Blade-Blossom as their commander on Playgroup, of which 420 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1627 | Sybertag | 4 | 4 |
| 2 | 1604 | Huriel19 | 9 | 6 |
| 3 | 1598 | Xobulo | 9 | 5 |
| 4 | 1586 | Arak | 11 | 6 |
| 5 | 1582 | gianmaverick | 17 | 7 |
How does this commander win?
When Najeela, the Blade-Blossom wins, 74.67% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Najeela, the Blade-Blossom wins 46.22% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Najeela, the Blade-Blossom wins 37.75% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Najeela, the Blade-Blossom 3.67/5 on average, across 1361 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Najeela, the Blade-Blossom wins, opponents flag the game as salty 59.4% of the time across 884 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Najeela, the Blade-Blossom. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
