Summary
Najeela, the Blade-Blossom is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 3,060 recorded Playgroup games, winning 36% of them (1107–1937) at an Elo of 1,621, ranking #381 globally.
Wins average 7 turns, with 116601 damage dealt and 0.69 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Najeela, the Blade-Blossom's win rate?
How long do winning games with Najeela, the Blade-Blossom take?
How many decks use Najeela, the Blade-Blossom?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1611 | Sybertag | 5 | 4 |
| 2 | 1598 | Xobulo | 9 | 5 |
| 3 | 1582 | gianmaverick | 17 | 7 |
| 4 | 1575 | Eric | 14 | 9 |
| 5 | 1574 | Huriel19 | 12 | 6 |
How does this commander win?
When Najeela, the Blade-Blossom wins, 75.45% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Najeela, the Blade-Blossom
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Najeela, the Blade-Blossom decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+5.5 pp |
| 2 |
|
+2.0 pp |
| 3 |
|
+1.2 pp |
| 4 |
|
+0.4 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Najeela, the Blade-Blossom wins 47.16% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Najeela, the Blade-Blossom wins 37.85% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Najeela, the Blade-Blossom 3.66/5 on average, across 1666 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Najeela, the Blade-Blossom wins, opponents flag the game as salty 59.0% of the time across 1127 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Najeela, the Blade-Blossom. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
