Data-Backed · Win Rates
Golgari Commanders
Golgari commanders have a 24.54% win rate across 45,431 games tracked in the last 365 days on Playgroup.gg, below the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
88
Ranked
45,431
Games
Win Rate
24.54%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
45,431
Last 365 Days
Avg Game Length
1h 46m
9.0 rounds
Commanders
88
With 40+ games
Win Conditions
Golgari commanders most commonly win through Combat (49.6% of wins) across 45,431 tracked games.
Combat
49.6%
Non Combat Damage
27.0%
Commander Damage
8.9%
Combo
8.0%
Alternative
3.6%
Poison
1.9%
Mill
1.0%
Game Concentration
9 commanders account for 50% of all Golgari games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
9
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
124 of 152 Golgari commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
81.6%
Coverage
124 played
152 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Golgari Commanders by Win Rate
88
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 41.26% | 93 | NEW | |
| 2 | S | 37.38% | 107 | NEW | |
| 3 | S | 36.31% | 42 | ▲+15.93% | |
| 4 | A | 33.65% | 52 | NEW | |
| 5 | A | 32.7% | 1599 | NEW | |
| 6 | A | 31.88% | 218 | ~ | |
| 7 | A | 31.86% | 485 | ~ | |
| 8 | A | 31.41% | 764 | ▼-3.04% | |
| 9 | A | 31.09% | 197 | ▲+10.16% | |
| 10 | A | 30.63% | 40 | ▼-4.82% | |
| 11 | A | 30.49% | 164 | ▲+6.72% | |
| 12 | B | 28.71% | 3731 | ~ | |
| 13 | B | 28.53% | 2190 | ~ | |
| 14 | B | 28.49% | 744 | ~ | |
| 15 | B | 28.02% | 290 | ▲+3.16% | |
| 16 | B | 27.93% | 128 | ▲+4.96% | |
| 17 | B | 27.89% | 95 | ▲+7.46% | |
| 18 | B | 27.89% | 1188 | ▲+4.33% | |
| 19 | B | 27.87% | 314 | ~ | |
| 20 | B | 27.8% | 161 | ~ | |
| 21 | B | 27.59% | 222 | ~ | |
| 22 | B | 27.37% | 95 | ▲+4.13% | |
| 23 | B | 26.65% | 577 | ▲+5.22% | |
| 24 | B | 26.56% | 217 | NEW | |
| 25 | B | 26.47% | 374 | ▲+3.17% | |
| 26 | B | 26.24% | 646 | ~ | |
| 27 | B | 26.2% | 187 | ~ | |
| 28 | B | 25.88% | 369 | ~ | |
| 29 | B | 25.82% | 92 | NEW | |
| 30 | B | 25.63% | 40 | NEW | |
| 31 | B | 25.57% | 899 | ~ | |
| 32 | B | 25.35% | 1660 | ~ | |
| 33 | B | 25.0% | 43 | ~ | |
| 34 | B | 24.9% | 1788 | ~ | |
| 35 | B | 24.8% | 4827 | ~ | |
| 36 | B | 24.61% | 258 | NEW | |
| 37 | B | 24.54% | 659 | ~ | |
| 38 | B | 24.44% | 532 | ~ | |
| 39 | B | 24.4% | 417 | ~ | |
| 40 | B | 23.65% | 1973 | NEW | |
| 41 | B | 23.51% | 3504 | ~ | |
| 42 | B | 23.49% | 573 | ~ | |
| 43 | B | 23.28% | 290 | ~ | |
| 44 | B | 23.22% | 549 | ▼-7.27% | |
| 45 | B | 23.19% | 871 | ~ | |
| 46 | B | 23.14% | 175 | NEW | |
| 47 | C | 22.85% | 93 | NEW | |
| 48 | C | 22.41% | 106 | ▼-3.13% | |
| 49 | C | 22.37% | 114 | ~ | |
| 50 | C | 22.24% | 136 | ▲+6.95% | |
| 51 | C | 22.21% | 376 | ~ | |
| 52 | C | 22.19% | 151 | NEW | |
| 53 | C | 22.03% | 177 | ~ | |
| 54 | C | 21.75% | 3775 | NEW | |
| 55 | C | 21.74% | 46 | NEW | |
| 56 | C | 21.69% | 136 | ▼-3.67% | |
| 57 | C | 21.2% | 46 | ▼-3.8% | |
| 58 | C | 20.88% | 85 | ▼-4.85% | |
| 59 | C | 20.75% | 347 | ~ | |
| 60 | C | 20.68% | 237 | ▼-3.99% | |
| 61 | C | 20.21% | 1434 | NEW | |
| 62 | C | 20.12% | 41 | NEW | |
| 63 | C | 19.86% | 107 | ▲+3.19% | |
| 64 | C | 19.39% | 245 | ▼-9.87% | |
| 65 | C | 19.24% | 850 | ~ | |
| 66 | C | 18.97% | 199 | NEW | |
| 67 | C | 18.72% | 179 | NEW | |
| 68 | C | 18.64% | 1045 | ~ | |
| 69 | C | 18.14% | 51 | NEW | |
| 70 | C | 18.0% | 175 | ~ | |
| 71 | D | 17.57% | 138 | ~ | |
| 72 | D | 17.34% | 173 | ▼-4.23% | |
| 73 | D | 16.93% | 158 | ~ | |
| 74 | D | 16.37% | 84 | ▼-5.85% | |
| 75 | D | 15.46% | 97 | NEW | |
| 76 | D | 14.88% | 42 | NEW | |
| 77 | D | 14.44% | 135 | ~ | |
| 78 | D | 13.7% | 230 | ▼-6.45% | |
| 79 | D | 13.16% | 188 | ~ | |
| 80 | D | 12.74% | 53 | NEW | |
| 81 | D | 12.73% | 108 | ▼-5.4% | |
| 82 | D | 12.07% | 317 | NEW | |
| 83 | D | 11.67% | 45 | ~ | |
| 84 | D | 11.67% | 135 | ~ | |
| 85 | D | 9.64% | 70 | ▼-14.64% | |
| 86 | D | 8.96% | 67 | ▼-12.83% | |
| 87 | D | 6.71% | 41 | NEW | |
| 88 | D | 1.74% | 43 | NEW |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Golgari
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Golgari commanders?
Golgari commanders have a 24.54% win rate across 45,431 tracked casual Commander games in the last 365 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Golgari commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 88 Golgari commanders with at least 40 recorded games and at least 7 distinct registered pilots in the last 365 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Golgari commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Golgari data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 365 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: