Summary
Jenova, Ancient Calamity is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 841 recorded Playgroup games, winning 31% of them (263–554) at an Elo of 1,420, ranking #4960 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 12231 damage dealt and 0.59 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Jenova, Ancient Calamity's win rate?
How long do winning games with Jenova, Ancient Calamity take?
How many decks use Jenova, Ancient Calamity?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1629 | Arasmas | 12 | 6 |
| 2 | 1597 | Dr_Worm | 4 | 4 |
| 3 | 1556 | hfry | 5 | 3 |
| 4 | 1556 | TheCoastIsBen | 9 | 4 |
| 5 | 1539 | Rudolf R. | 1 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Jenova, Ancient Calamity wins, 66.67% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Jenova, Ancient Calamity
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Jenova, Ancient Calamity decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+8.8 pp |
| 2 |
|
+8.7 pp |
| 3 |
|
+6.3 pp |
| 4 |
|
+2.8 pp |
| 5 |
|
+2.8 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Jenova, Ancient Calamity wins 41.92% of games from position 1 and 14.29% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Jenova, Ancient Calamity wins 32.26% after 0 mulligans and 50.0% after 4 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Jenova, Ancient Calamity 3.88/5 on average, across 545 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Jenova, Ancient Calamity wins, opponents flag the game as salty 24.4% of the time across 270 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Jenova, Ancient Calamity. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
