Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons
Global Commander StatsSummary
Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,156 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (325–831) at an Elo of 1,428, ranking #3536 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 253425 damage dealt and 0.68 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons's win rate? ▾
Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons has a 28% win rate across 1156 recorded Playgroup games (325 wins, 831 losses).
How long do winning games with Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons take? ▾
Wins with Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 15 days.
How many decks use Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons? ▾
467 decks list Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons as their commander on Playgroup, of which 240 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1621 | cl3v3rtr3vor | 11 | 7 |
| 2 | 1545 | BartOrge | 5 | 3 |
| 3 | 1536 | Hecqubus | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1536 | nightflier | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 1524 | Seamus Tracy | 3 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons wins, 36.13% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons wins 33.44% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons wins 25.96% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons 3.72/5 on average, across 844 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons wins, opponents flag the game as salty 71.7% of the time across 339 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
