Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma
Global Commander StatsSummary
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,291 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (364–927) at an Elo of 1,463, ranking #3143 globally.
Wins average 8 turns, with 30 damage dealt and 0.65 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma's win rate? ▾
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma has a 28% win rate across 1291 recorded Playgroup games (364 wins, 927 losses).
How long do winning games with Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma take? ▾
Wins with Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma take on average 8 turns. Total tracked play time: 14 days.
How many decks use Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma? ▾
402 decks list Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma as their commander on Playgroup, of which 219 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1792 | Panface | 34 | 20 |
| 2 | 1548 | JollyJeskai | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 1536 | Yam Bandit | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1525 | Massacor | 2 | 1 |
| 5 | 1523 | Eduardo | 12 | 4 |
How does this commander win?
When Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma wins, 86.45% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma wins 33.6% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma wins 27.99% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 3.7/5 on average, across 957 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma wins, opponents flag the game as salty 72.8% of the time across 378 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
