Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald
Global Commander StatsSummary
Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 2,492 recorded Playgroup games, winning 29% of them (733–1759) at an Elo of 1,495, ranking #2528 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 6 damage dealt and 0.65 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald's win rate? ▾
Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald has a 29% win rate across 2492 recorded Playgroup games (733 wins, 1759 losses).
How long do winning games with Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald take? ▾
Wins with Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 15 days.
How many decks use Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald? ▾
849 decks list Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald as their commander on Playgroup, of which 495 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1625 | ChewyPudding | 35 | 19 |
| 2 | 1572 | Toby One Kenobi | 6 | 4 |
| 3 | 1548 | Mark Fear | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1547 | justafanofz | 7 | 2 |
| 5 | 1547 | OGFreeWilly | 5 | 3 |
How does this commander win?
When Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald wins, 76.16% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald wins 39.58% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald wins 29.77% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald 3.73/5 on average, across 1565 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald wins, opponents flag the game as salty 62.2% of the time across 759 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
