Summary
Shilgengar, Sire of Famine is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 2,018 recorded Playgroup games, winning 38% of them (781–1217) at an Elo of 1,534, ranking #1403 globally.
Wins average 10 turns, with 72 damage dealt and 0.7 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Shilgengar, Sire of Famine's win rate?
How long do winning games with Shilgengar, Sire of Famine take?
How many decks use Shilgengar, Sire of Famine?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1709 | ducktective | 22 | 14 |
| 2 | 1661 | Kara✨ | 28 | 15 |
| 3 | 1650 | carcidi36 | 38 | 31 |
| 4 | 1617 | Wilcore | 8 | 5 |
| 5 | 1600 | todoquisque | 6 | 4 |
How does this commander win?
When Shilgengar, Sire of Famine wins, 51.97% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Shilgengar, Sire of Famine
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Shilgengar, Sire of Famine decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+1.8 pp |
| 2 |
|
+1.2 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Shilgengar, Sire of Famine wins 45.55% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Shilgengar, Sire of Famine wins 38.23% after 0 mulligans and 33.33% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Shilgengar, Sire of Famine 3.77/5 on average, across 1409 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Shilgengar, Sire of Famine wins, opponents flag the game as salty 33.7% of the time across 792 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Shilgengar, Sire of Famine. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
