Azorius Commanders
Top Azorius commanders by win rate right now: Raff Capashen, Ship's Mage, Heliod, the Radiant Dawn // Heliod, the Warped Eclipse, and Taigam, Ojutai Master. Azorius commanders have a 24.6% win rate across 13,843 games tracked in the last 180 days on Playgroup.gg, below the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
Win Conditions
Azorius commanders most commonly win through Combat (57.2% of wins) across 13,843 tracked games.
Game Concentration
12 commanders account for 50% of all Azorius games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
Commander Coverage
143 of 179 Azorius commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
Trending Commanders
Azorius Commanders by Win Rate
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 41.67% | 30 | ~ | |
| 2 | S | 39.5% | 231 | ~ | |
| 3 | S | 38.69% | 42 | ▲+12.58% | |
| 4 | S | 38.31% | 77 | ▼-13.7% | |
| 5 | S | 35.64% | 101 | NEW | |
| 6 | S | 35.16% | 251 | ▼-4.99% | |
| 7 | A | 34.87% | 38 | ~ | |
| 8 | A | 32.86% | 35 | NEW | |
| 9 | A | 32.4% | 169 | ▲+6.56% | |
| 10 | A | 32.09% | 314 | ~ | |
| 11 | A | 31.79% | 565 | ~ | |
| 12 | A | 31.41% | 39 | ▲+5.65% | |
| 13 | A | 30.65% | 84 | ▼-7.1% | |
| 14 | A | 30.25% | 81 | NEW | |
| 15 | B | 29.29% | 140 | ~ | |
| 16 | B | 28.83% | 137 | ~ | |
| 17 | B | 28.5% | 182 | ▼-5.58% | |
| 18 | B | 28.37% | 104 | ~ | |
| 19 | B | 27.74% | 73 | ~ | |
| 20 | B | 27.16% | 1164 | ~ | |
| 21 | B | 26.78% | 533 | ~ | |
| 22 | B | 26.41% | 709 | ▼-3.86% | |
| 23 | B | 25.96% | 26 | NEW | |
| 24 | B | 25.95% | 210 | NEW | |
| 25 | B | 25.86% | 29 | NEW | |
| 26 | B | 25.83% | 30 | NEW | |
| 27 | B | 25.8% | 754 | ~ | |
| 28 | B | 25.61% | 82 | ▲+6.47% | |
| 29 | B | 25.4% | 62 | NEW | |
| 30 | B | 24.34% | 267 | ▲+3.9% | |
| 31 | B | 24.34% | 303 | ▼-3.49% | |
| 32 | B | 24.02% | 561 | ~ | |
| 33 | B | 23.89% | 45 | ▲+7.89% | |
| 34 | B | 23.75% | 40 | ▲+8.04% | |
| 35 | B | 23.67% | 113 | ▲+13.11% | |
| 36 | B | 23.53% | 51 | ▲+7.23% | |
| 37 | B | 23.29% | 505 | ~ | |
| 38 | C | 22.99% | 112 | ~ | |
| 39 | C | 22.68% | 140 | ~ | |
| 40 | C | 22.42% | 165 | NEW | |
| 41 | C | 22.4% | 154 | ▼-11.39% | |
| 42 | C | 22.32% | 205 | ▼-8.04% | |
| 43 | C | 22.24% | 380 | NEW | |
| 44 | C | 22.03% | 59 | ~ | |
| 45 | C | 22.02% | 42 | NEW | |
| 46 | C | 22.0% | 296 | ~ | |
| 47 | C | 21.97% | 66 | ▼-3.03% | |
| 48 | C | 21.7% | 944 | ~ | |
| 49 | C | 21.61% | 59 | NEW | |
| 50 | C | 21.36% | 55 | ~ | |
| 51 | C | 21.3% | 54 | NEW | |
| 52 | C | 21.07% | 70 | NEW | |
| 53 | C | 21.07% | 89 | ▼-7.67% | |
| 54 | C | 20.81% | 173 | NEW | |
| 55 | C | 20.14% | 36 | ▼-4.44% | |
| 56 | C | 19.89% | 198 | NEW | |
| 57 | C | 19.07% | 135 | NEW | |
| 58 | C | 18.99% | 104 | ▼-10.82% | |
| 59 | C | 18.84% | 207 | ▼-3.51% | |
| 60 | C | 18.33% | 30 | NEW | |
| 61 | C | 18.08% | 121 | ▼-3.02% | |
| 62 | C | 18.01% | 68 | ~ | |
| 63 | D | 16.72% | 151 | ~ | |
| 64 | D | 16.5% | 50 | ▼-7.22% | |
| 65 | D | 15.75% | 423 | ~ | |
| 66 | D | 15.74% | 27 | NEW | |
| 67 | D | 15.57% | 53 | ~ | |
| 68 | D | 14.89% | 115 | ~ | |
| 69 | D | 14.42% | 52 | ~ | |
| 70 | D | 13.79% | 58 | ▼-9.82% | |
| 71 | D | 13.79% | 136 | ▼-5.17% | |
| 72 | D | 10.94% | 64 | ▼-7.63% | |
| 73 | D | 10.9% | 39 | ▼-10.87% | |
| 74 | D | 7.0% | 25 | NEW |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
