Gisa and Geralf
Global commander stats
All Dimir commanders
Featured in Starter Commander Decks
Summary
Gisa and Geralf is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 2,745 recorded Playgroup games, winning 28% of them (769–1952) at an Elo of 1,329, ranking #4897 globally.
Wins average 10 turns, with 685745 damage dealt and 0.51 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Gisa and Geralf's win rate?
How long do winning games with Gisa and Geralf take?
How many decks use Gisa and Geralf?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1594 | Nathan m | 6 | 4 |
| 2 | 1577 | carcidi36 | 71 | 49 |
| 3 | 1559 | Dhobby24 | 40 | 22 |
| 4 | 1545 | Hobbes | 58 | 18 |
| 5 | 1536 | Antihero108 | 1 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Gisa and Geralf wins, 69.49% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Gisa and Geralf
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Gisa and Geralf decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+5.5 pp |
| 2 |
|
+2.0 pp |
| 3 |
|
+1.4 pp |
| 4 |
|
+0.9 pp |
| 5 |
|
+0.8 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Gisa and Geralf wins 36.22% of games from position 1 and 17.65% from position 4 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Gisa and Geralf wins 26.74% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 6 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Gisa and Geralf 3.65/5 on average, across 1982 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Gisa and Geralf wins, opponents flag the game as salty 75.3% of the time across 813 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Gisa and Geralf. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
