Summary
Loot, Exuberant Explorer is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 986 recorded Playgroup games, winning 31% of them (309–669) at an Elo of 1,531, ranking #1424 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 97 damage dealt and 0.62 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Loot, Exuberant Explorer's win rate?
How long do winning games with Loot, Exuberant Explorer take?
How many decks use Loot, Exuberant Explorer?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1614 | Justin, the hellraiser | 53 | 20 |
| 2 | 1586 | Puzyri | 18 | 13 |
| 3 | 1559 | PlayazZ | 10 | 5 |
| 4 | 1512 | ArdenDelaer | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 1510 | Chakraa | 5 | 3 |
How does this commander win?
When Loot, Exuberant Explorer wins, 89.02% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Loot, Exuberant Explorer
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Loot, Exuberant Explorer decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+8.8 pp |
| 2 |
|
+0.7 pp |
| 3 |
|
+0.3 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Loot, Exuberant Explorer wins 39.72% of games from position 1 and 0.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Loot, Exuberant Explorer wins 31.69% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Loot, Exuberant Explorer 3.72/5 on average, across 734 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Loot, Exuberant Explorer wins, opponents flag the game as salty 66.1% of the time across 319 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Loot, Exuberant Explorer. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.