Commander

Radagast of Rhosgobel

Global commander stats

All Green commanders

214 Wins

401 Losses

Overview

Summary

Radagast of Rhosgobel is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 636 recorded Playgroup games, winning 33% of them (214–401) at an Elo of 1,444, ranking #4948 globally.

Wins average 8 turns, with 27 damage dealt and 0.48 player kills per game on average.

Last full refresh 12 Nov 2026

Sources Scryfall · EDHREC · JSON API

Frequently Asked

What is Radagast of Rhosgobel's win rate?

Radagast of Rhosgobel has a 33% win rate across 636 recorded Playgroup games (214 wins, 401 losses).

How long do winning games with Radagast of Rhosgobel take?

Wins with Radagast of Rhosgobel take on average 8 turns. Total tracked play time: 7 days.

How many decks use Radagast of Rhosgobel?

304 decks list Radagast of Rhosgobel as their commander on Playgroup, of which 230 have played at least one recorded game.

Radagast of Rhosgobel Magic: The Gathering commander card art

Buy on TCGplayer

Global rank

4948

Wins by turn (avg.)

Elo rating

1444

Trend

Global Elo trend

Trend

Commander popularity trend

Averages

Misc. stats

Average damage per game 27

Average commander damage per game 4

Average poison counters given per game 7

Average kills per game 0.48

Average turn length 2 minutes

No. decks for this commander 304

No. decks with at least one game for this commander 230

No. games played with this commander 636

Total hours played 7 days

Community

Top 5 public decks

Rank	Elo	User	Games	Wins	Winrate
1	1593	Q	5	4	80 %
2	1578	LL	11	7	64 %
3	1577	spartns	4	4	100 %
4	1574	MoneyMicah	6	4	67 %
5	1565	Hoot	4	2	50 %

Outcomes

How does this commander win?

When Radagast of Rhosgobel wins, 89.26% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.

Combat

89.26%

Poison

4.13%

Alternative

2.48%

Commander Damage

1.65%

Non Combat Damage

1.65%

Combo

0.83%

Avg win turn 8.1 based on 215 wins with recorded turn counts

Measured

Staples that win games for Radagast of Rhosgobel

Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Radagast of Rhosgobel decks that leave them out.

+15.4 pp

Top card: Apex Devastator

#	Card	Lift Win-rate lift	Games
1	Apex Devastator 92 games	+15.4 pp	92
2	Emerald Medallion 134 games	+12.1 pp	134
3	Greater Good 38 games	+9.2 pp	38
4	Garruk's Packleader 62 games	+4.7 pp	62
5	Guardian Project 127 games	+4.0 pp	127
6	Karametra's Acolyte 63 games	+3.4 pp	63
7	Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea 89 games	+3.2 pp	89
8	Nature's Lore 42 games	+3.0 pp	42
9	Overwhelming Stampede 44 games	+2.7 pp	44
10	Beast Whisperer 150 games	+2.0 pp	150

Show 5 more (ranks 11-15)

#	Card	Lift Win-rate lift	Games
11	Beast Within 90 games	+1.9 pp	90
12	Rishkar's Expertise 65 games	+1.8 pp	65
13	Selvala, Heart of the Wilds 96 games	+1.7 pp	96
14	Garruk's Uprising 161 games	+1.6 pp	161
15	Fyndhorn Elves 74 games	+1.1 pp	74

Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured

Table position

Does seating order matter?

Radagast of Rhosgobel wins 46.12% of games from position 1 and 10.0% from position 5 across tracked games.

Seat 1

46.12% n=232

Seat 2

32.38% n=193

Seat 3

26.32% n=133

Seat 4

19.53% n=64

Seat 5

10.0% n=10

Opening hands

Do mulligans hurt this commander?

Across tracked games, Radagast of Rhosgobel wins 45.42% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 4 mulligans.

0 mulligans

45.42% n=153

1 mulligan

36.27% n=142

2 mulligans

32.14% n=42

3 mulligans

22.73% n=22

4 mulligans

0.0% n=4

Player reports

How do players rate games with this commander?

Pilot rating

Pilots rate their own games with Radagast of Rhosgobel 3.83/5 on average, across 358 self-reports.

3.83 / 5

🧂

Opponent salt

When Radagast of Rhosgobel wins, opponents flag the game as salty 12.7% of the time across 220 tracked wins.

12.7 \%

Head to head

Best and worst matchups

Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Radagast of Rhosgobel. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.