Data-Backed · Win Rates
Orzhov Commanders
Orzhov commanders have a 25.08% win rate across 23,941 games tracked in the last 180 days on Playgroup.gg, above the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
86
Ranked
23,941
Games
Win Rate
25.08%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
23,941
Last 180 Days
Avg Game Length
4h 4m
9.1 rounds
Commanders
86
With 25+ games
Win Conditions
Orzhov commanders most commonly win through Combat (49.7% of wins) across 23,941 tracked games.
Combat
49.7%
Non Combat Damage
26.4%
Commander Damage
9.1%
Combo
8.2%
Alternative
5.4%
Poison
0.7%
Mill
0.5%
Game Concentration
13 commanders account for 50% of all Orzhov games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
13
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
122 of 158 Orzhov commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
77.2%
Coverage
122 played
158 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Orzhov Commanders by Win Rate
86
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 38.41% | 41 | NEW | |
| 2 | S | 38.19% | 72 | ▲+11.34% | |
| 3 | S | 38.02% | 48 | ▲+13.83% | |
| 4 | S | 38.0% | 25 | NEW | |
| 5 | S | 35.05% | 214 | ~ | |
| 6 | A | 33.71% | 33 | NEW | |
| 7 | A | 33.44% | 157 | ~ | |
| 8 | A | 33.0% | 25 | NEW | |
| 9 | A | 32.86% | 124 | ▼-5.32% | |
| 10 | A | 32.75% | 229 | ~ | |
| 11 | A | 32.06% | 85 | ▲+12.77% | |
| 12 | A | 31.35% | 419 | ~ | |
| 13 | A | 30.47% | 1268 | ~ | |
| 14 | A | 30.25% | 281 | ~ | |
| 15 | B | 29.92% | 711 | NEW | |
| 16 | B | 29.88% | 484 | ▼-5.6% | |
| 17 | B | 29.46% | 462 | ~ | |
| 18 | B | 28.69% | 417 | ▼-4.89% | |
| 19 | B | 28.49% | 398 | ▼-6.25% | |
| 20 | B | 28.09% | 461 | ~ | |
| 21 | B | 28.06% | 904 | ▲+4.92% | |
| 22 | B | 27.84% | 334 | ▲+5.35% | |
| 23 | B | 27.69% | 158 | ▲+13.63% | |
| 24 | B | 27.57% | 408 | ▼-3.03% | |
| 25 | B | 27.52% | 590 | ~ | |
| 26 | B | 27.38% | 42 | ▼-6.91% | |
| 27 | B | 27.2% | 216 | ▼-3.73% | |
| 28 | B | 27.13% | 47 | NEW | |
| 29 | B | 27.03% | 37 | ▼-4.83% | |
| 30 | B | 26.97% | 38 | ~ | |
| 31 | B | 26.52% | 841 | ~ | |
| 32 | B | 26.43% | 680 | ~ | |
| 33 | B | 26.3% | 135 | ▼-7.12% | |
| 34 | B | 26.08% | 301 | ~ | |
| 35 | B | 25.28% | 1159 | ~ | |
| 36 | B | 25.0% | 181 | ~ | |
| 37 | B | 24.91% | 137 | ▼-6.12% | |
| 38 | B | 24.83% | 227 | ▲+5.54% | |
| 39 | B | 24.73% | 280 | ~ | |
| 40 | B | 24.57% | 175 | ~ | |
| 41 | B | 24.21% | 158 | ~ | |
| 42 | B | 24.11% | 28 | NEW | |
| 43 | B | 24.05% | 79 | ▲+9.17% | |
| 44 | B | 23.44% | 48 | ~ | |
| 45 | B | 23.36% | 388 | ▼-3.58% | |
| 46 | B | 23.35% | 3516 | ~ | |
| 47 | B | 23.34% | 301 | ~ | |
| 48 | B | 23.29% | 190 | ~ | |
| 49 | B | 23.18% | 323 | ▼-6.67% | |
| 50 | B | 23.15% | 27 | NEW | |
| 51 | B | 23.11% | 185 | ▼-4.58% | |
| 52 | C | 22.75% | 444 | ~ | |
| 53 | C | 22.43% | 302 | ▼-4.59% | |
| 54 | C | 22.39% | 153 | ▼-4.97% | |
| 55 | C | 22.36% | 142 | ▼-5.01% | |
| 56 | C | 22.32% | 56 | ▼-15.44% | |
| 57 | C | 22.23% | 1061 | ~ | |
| 58 | C | 21.88% | 72 | ▲+8.92% | |
| 59 | C | 21.5% | 286 | ~ | |
| 60 | C | 21.15% | 78 | ▼-9.79% | |
| 61 | C | 21.11% | 151 | ▼-3.7% | |
| 62 | C | 21.03% | 63 | ~ | |
| 63 | C | 20.69% | 29 | NEW | |
| 64 | C | 20.48% | 442 | ▲+5.97% | |
| 65 | C | 20.41% | 109 | ▼-5.2% | |
| 66 | C | 19.89% | 71 | NEW | |
| 67 | C | 19.86% | 73 | NEW | |
| 68 | C | 19.77% | 129 | ~ | |
| 69 | C | 19.72% | 90 | ▲+3.13% | |
| 70 | C | 19.69% | 106 | ▼-9.48% | |
| 71 | C | 19.66% | 89 | NEW | |
| 72 | C | 19.6% | 176 | ▼-14.25% | |
| 73 | C | 19.02% | 92 | ▼-8.68% | |
| 74 | C | 18.99% | 231 | ▼-7.26% | |
| 75 | C | 18.64% | 173 | ▼-4.75% | |
| 76 | C | 18.09% | 391 | ~ | |
| 77 | C | 18.06% | 36 | NEW | |
| 78 | C | 18.03% | 294 | ~ | |
| 79 | D | 17.86% | 28 | NEW | |
| 80 | D | 17.51% | 387 | ~ | |
| 81 | D | 16.67% | 69 | NEW | |
| 82 | D | 15.97% | 90 | ▼-7.71% | |
| 83 | D | 14.9% | 52 | ~ | |
| 84 | D | 13.86% | 92 | ▼-6.53% | |
| 85 | D | 12.5% | 32 | NEW | |
| 86 | D | 7.65% | 147 | ▼-4.19% |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Orzhov
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Orzhov commanders?
Orzhov commanders have a 25.08% win rate across 23,941 tracked casual Commander games in the last 180 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Orzhov commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 86 Orzhov commanders with at least 25 recorded games and at least 5 distinct registered pilots in the last 180 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Orzhov commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Orzhov data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 180 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: