Data-Backed · Win Rates
Orzhov Commanders
Orzhov commanders have a 25.51% win rate across 40,147 games tracked in the last 365 days on Playgroup.gg, above the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
87
Ranked
40,147
Games
Win Rate
25.51%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
40,147
Last 365 Days
Avg Game Length
2h 53m
9.2 rounds
Commanders
87
With 40+ games
Win Conditions
Orzhov commanders most commonly win through Combat (48.4% of wins) across 40,147 tracked games.
Combat
48.4%
Non Combat Damage
29.0%
Commander Damage
8.7%
Combo
7.5%
Alternative
5.3%
Poison
0.7%
Mill
0.5%
Game Concentration
14 commanders account for 50% of all Orzhov games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
14
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
125 of 158 Orzhov commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
79.1%
Coverage
125 played
158 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Orzhov Commanders by Win Rate
87
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 40.49% | 46 | NEW | |
| 2 | S | 38.41% | 41 | NEW | |
| 3 | S | 35.78% | 399 | ~ | |
| 4 | S | 35.68% | 295 | ~ | |
| 5 | A | 34.29% | 350 | ~ | |
| 6 | A | 33.33% | 126 | ▲+4.93% | |
| 7 | A | 32.37% | 356 | ▲+8.08% | |
| 8 | A | 32.35% | 873 | ~ | |
| 9 | A | 32.19% | 80 | ▲+10.76% | |
| 10 | A | 31.78% | 2330 | ~ | |
| 11 | A | 31.31% | 656 | ~ | |
| 12 | A | 31.18% | 755 | ~ | |
| 13 | A | 31.14% | 460 | ~ | |
| 14 | A | 30.95% | 666 | ~ | |
| 15 | A | 30.88% | 68 | ▲+14.0% | |
| 16 | A | 30.63% | 40 | ~ | |
| 17 | A | 30.52% | 77 | ~ | |
| 18 | A | 30.15% | 738 | NEW | |
| 19 | B | 29.89% | 92 | ~ | |
| 20 | B | 29.52% | 105 | ▼-8.84% | |
| 21 | B | 29.3% | 784 | ~ | |
| 22 | B | 29.29% | 233 | ▲+5.43% | |
| 23 | B | 28.8% | 678 | ~ | |
| 24 | B | 28.67% | 773 | ~ | |
| 25 | B | 28.1% | 1019 | ▼-3.21% | |
| 26 | B | 28.1% | 121 | ▼-3.83% | |
| 27 | B | 28.0% | 275 | ▲+5.08% | |
| 28 | B | 27.55% | 49 | ▲+14.6% | |
| 29 | B | 27.17% | 225 | ~ | |
| 30 | B | 27.16% | 1106 | NEW | |
| 31 | B | 27.13% | 82 | NEW | |
| 32 | B | 26.99% | 516 | ▲+4.1% | |
| 33 | B | 26.63% | 46 | NEW | |
| 34 | B | 26.21% | 589 | NEW | |
| 35 | B | 26.21% | 1262 | ~ | |
| 36 | B | 26.2% | 334 | ▲+8.18% | |
| 37 | B | 26.19% | 2306 | ~ | |
| 38 | B | 25.94% | 159 | ▼-6.16% | |
| 39 | B | 25.55% | 588 | ~ | |
| 40 | B | 25.51% | 247 | ~ | |
| 41 | B | 25.39% | 190 | ▼-4.18% | |
| 42 | B | 25.33% | 526 | ▲+3.18% | |
| 43 | B | 25.16% | 321 | ~ | |
| 44 | B | 25.05% | 1523 | ~ | |
| 45 | B | 25.0% | 580 | ▼-5.72% | |
| 46 | B | 24.87% | 662 | ~ | |
| 47 | B | 24.64% | 278 | ▲+3.93% | |
| 48 | B | 24.21% | 346 | ▲+4.01% | |
| 49 | B | 24.05% | 263 | ~ | |
| 50 | B | 23.9% | 91 | ▼-5.84% | |
| 51 | B | 23.52% | 692 | ~ | |
| 52 | B | 23.36% | 5124 | NEW | |
| 53 | B | 23.33% | 172 | ▼-9.36% | |
| 54 | B | 23.26% | 43 | ▼-10.51% | |
| 55 | B | 23.19% | 318 | ~ | |
| 56 | B | 23.01% | 282 | ▲+5.01% | |
| 57 | C | 22.66% | 224 | NEW | |
| 58 | C | 22.08% | 806 | ▼-4.22% | |
| 59 | C | 22.07% | 431 | ~ | |
| 60 | C | 21.96% | 461 | ~ | |
| 61 | C | 21.69% | 151 | ~ | |
| 62 | C | 21.62% | 1944 | ~ | |
| 63 | C | 21.45% | 356 | ~ | |
| 64 | C | 21.43% | 133 | ~ | |
| 65 | C | 20.87% | 121 | ▼-10.68% | |
| 66 | C | 20.48% | 282 | NEW | |
| 67 | C | 20.35% | 172 | ▼-16.66% | |
| 68 | C | 19.66% | 89 | NEW | |
| 69 | C | 19.64% | 42 | NEW | |
| 70 | C | 19.62% | 72 | NEW | |
| 71 | C | 19.6% | 88 | NEW | |
| 72 | C | 19.51% | 148 | ▲+5.18% | |
| 73 | C | 19.32% | 44 | NEW | |
| 74 | C | 18.75% | 228 | ▼-8.41% | |
| 75 | C | 18.6% | 43 | NEW | |
| 76 | C | 18.17% | 769 | ▼-5.63% | |
| 77 | C | 18.06% | 710 | ▼-6.94% | |
| 78 | C | 18.06% | 126 | ~ | |
| 79 | D | 17.92% | 53 | ▼-15.01% | |
| 80 | D | 17.84% | 199 | ~ | |
| 81 | D | 17.79% | 808 | ▲+3.19% | |
| 82 | D | 17.44% | 410 | NEW | |
| 83 | D | 16.84% | 49 | ▲+6.84% | |
| 84 | D | 16.82% | 168 | NEW | |
| 85 | D | 16.48% | 88 | NEW | |
| 86 | D | 13.66% | 86 | ▼-6.67% | |
| 87 | D | 8.74% | 206 | ▼-3.9% |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Orzhov
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Orzhov commanders?
Orzhov commanders have a 25.51% win rate across 40,147 tracked casual Commander games in the last 365 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Orzhov commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 87 Orzhov commanders with at least 40 recorded games and at least 7 distinct registered pilots in the last 365 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Orzhov commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Orzhov data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 365 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: