Data-Backed · Win Rates
Orzhov Commanders
Orzhov commanders have a 24.75% win rate across 13,516 games tracked in the last 90 days on Playgroup.gg, below the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
85
Ranked
13,516
Games
Win Rate
24.75%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
13,516
Last 90 Days
Avg Game Length
4h 55m
8.9 rounds
Commanders
85
With 15+ games
Win Conditions
Orzhov commanders most commonly win through Combat (48.1% of wins) across 13,516 tracked games.
Combat
48.1%
Non Combat Damage
26.0%
Combo
10.6%
Commander Damage
8.5%
Alternative
5.5%
Poison
0.8%
Mill
0.5%
Game Concentration
14 commanders account for 50% of all Orzhov games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
14
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
117 of 158 Orzhov commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
74.1%
Coverage
117 played
158 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Orzhov Commanders by Win Rate
85
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 39.64% | 111 | ▲+13.37% | |
| 2 | S | 38.41% | 41 | NEW | |
| 3 | S | 38.33% | 45 | ~ | |
| 4 | S | 37.5% | 22 | NEW | |
| 5 | S | 37.5% | 17 | ▲+7.81% | |
| 6 | A | 33.8% | 54 | ▲+12.5% | |
| 7 | A | 33.78% | 131 | ▼-3.27% | |
| 8 | A | 33.57% | 70 | ▲+8.57% | |
| 9 | A | 33.22% | 76 | ~ | |
| 10 | A | 32.1% | 183 | ▲+5.31% | |
| 11 | A | 31.82% | 22 | ▲+9.32% | |
| 12 | A | 31.38% | 198 | ▲+5.12% | |
| 13 | A | 30.75% | 87 | ▼-6.04% | |
| 14 | A | 30.29% | 333 | ~ | |
| 15 | A | 30.11% | 286 | ▼-3.91% | |
| 16 | B | 29.86% | 700 | NEW | |
| 17 | B | 29.17% | 18 | ▲+4.17% | |
| 18 | B | 28.63% | 751 | ▼-4.52% | |
| 19 | B | 28.59% | 327 | ~ | |
| 20 | B | 28.49% | 186 | ▲+9.32% | |
| 21 | B | 28.33% | 30 | ▼-25.84% | |
| 22 | B | 28.27% | 130 | ▲+3.27% | |
| 23 | B | 27.73% | 261 | ~ | |
| 24 | B | 27.66% | 47 | ▲+16.95% | |
| 25 | B | 27.44% | 436 | ~ | |
| 26 | B | 27.05% | 507 | ~ | |
| 27 | B | 26.96% | 140 | ▲+5.55% | |
| 28 | B | 26.85% | 27 | ▲+8.75% | |
| 29 | B | 26.82% | 303 | ▼-8.19% | |
| 30 | B | 26.58% | 230 | ▲+7.91% | |
| 31 | B | 26.36% | 378 | ▼-3.24% | |
| 32 | B | 26.08% | 139 | ~ | |
| 33 | B | 26.06% | 235 | ▼-3.56% | |
| 34 | B | 25.26% | 98 | ~ | |
| 35 | B | 25.0% | 39 | ▲+6.82% | |
| 36 | B | 24.85% | 166 | ~ | |
| 37 | B | 24.75% | 101 | ~ | |
| 38 | B | 24.64% | 35 | ▲+9.36% | |
| 39 | B | 24.48% | 48 | ▲+8.65% | |
| 40 | B | 23.61% | 18 | ▼-6.39% | |
| 41 | B | 23.6% | 1411 | ~ | |
| 42 | B | 23.32% | 208 | ▼-12.0% | |
| 43 | B | 23.01% | 572 | ▼-4.48% | |
| 44 | C | 22.67% | 268 | ▲+5.57% | |
| 45 | C | 22.67% | 225 | ~ | |
| 46 | C | 22.47% | 148 | ~ | |
| 47 | C | 22.37% | 19 | NEW | |
| 48 | C | 22.35% | 378 | ▼-9.19% | |
| 49 | C | 22.16% | 44 | ▲+4.77% | |
| 50 | C | 21.36% | 79 | ▼-8.38% | |
| 51 | C | 21.36% | 79 | ~ | |
| 52 | C | 21.32% | 102 | ▼-8.14% | |
| 53 | C | 21.26% | 107 | ▼-4.38% | |
| 54 | C | 20.94% | 160 | ▼-3.18% | |
| 55 | C | 20.83% | 72 | ~ | |
| 56 | C | 20.64% | 648 | ▼-4.09% | |
| 57 | C | 20.59% | 102 | ▼-5.39% | |
| 58 | C | 20.27% | 37 | ~ | |
| 59 | C | 19.87% | 39 | ▼-8.26% | |
| 60 | C | 19.72% | 161 | ▼-4.08% | |
| 61 | C | 19.29% | 186 | ~ | |
| 62 | C | 19.12% | 34 | NEW | |
| 63 | C | 18.97% | 29 | ▼-11.29% | |
| 64 | C | 18.7% | 121 | ~ | |
| 65 | C | 18.64% | 169 | ▼-10.72% | |
| 66 | C | 18.53% | 116 | ▼-12.21% | |
| 67 | C | 18.48% | 23 | NEW | |
| 68 | D | 17.96% | 103 | ~ | |
| 69 | D | 17.86% | 28 | NEW | |
| 70 | D | 17.39% | 23 | ▼-19.07% | |
| 71 | D | 16.96% | 28 | ▲+4.46% | |
| 72 | D | 16.84% | 98 | ▼-6.24% | |
| 73 | D | 16.6% | 61 | ▼-7.29% | |
| 74 | D | 16.35% | 26 | ~ | |
| 75 | D | 16.13% | 31 | ▼-4.36% | |
| 76 | D | 15.9% | 195 | ▼-3.24% | |
| 77 | D | 15.63% | 40 | ▼-9.37% | |
| 78 | D | 15.53% | 161 | ▼-5.52% | |
| 79 | D | 15.42% | 60 | ▼-12.02% | |
| 80 | D | 14.25% | 50 | ▼-3.88% | |
| 81 | D | 13.33% | 15 | NEW | |
| 82 | D | 12.26% | 53 | ▼-3.77% | |
| 83 | D | 10.94% | 64 | ▼-22.95% | |
| 84 | D | 8.68% | 72 | ~ | |
| 85 | D | 6.82% | 22 | NEW |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Orzhov
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Orzhov commanders?
Orzhov commanders have a 24.75% win rate across 13,516 tracked casual Commander games in the last 90 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Orzhov commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 85 Orzhov commanders with at least 15 recorded games and at least 4 distinct registered pilots in the last 90 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Orzhov commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Orzhov data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 90 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: