Summary
Lazav, Dimir Mastermind is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 707 recorded Playgroup games, winning 22% of them (158–547) at an Elo of 1,535, ranking #1361 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 5 damage dealt and 0.46 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Lazav, Dimir Mastermind's win rate?
How long do winning games with Lazav, Dimir Mastermind take?
How many decks use Lazav, Dimir Mastermind?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1640 | Kara✨ | 23 | 14 |
| 2 | 1562 | Goombill | 8 | 4 |
| 3 | 1535 | Daybae | 5 | 3 |
| 4 | 1509 | Khalom | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 1501 | Hym | 10 | 3 |
How does this commander win?
When Lazav, Dimir Mastermind wins, 36.92% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Lazav, Dimir Mastermind
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Lazav, Dimir Mastermind decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+15.1 pp |
| 2 |
|
+11.3 pp |
| 3 |
|
+9.8 pp |
| 4 |
|
+4.4 pp |
| 5 |
|
+1.3 pp |
| 6 |
|
+0.4 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Lazav, Dimir Mastermind wins 26.04% of games from position 1 and 11.11% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Lazav, Dimir Mastermind wins 23.94% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 4 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Lazav, Dimir Mastermind 3.69/5 on average, across 492 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Lazav, Dimir Mastermind wins, opponents flag the game as salty 71.3% of the time across 167 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Lazav, Dimir Mastermind. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
