Obeka, Brute Chronologist
Global Commander StatsSummary
Obeka, Brute Chronologist is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,617 recorded Playgroup games, winning 27% of them (442–1175) at an Elo of 1,630, ranking #281 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 10 damage dealt and 0.61 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Obeka, Brute Chronologist's win rate? ▾
Obeka, Brute Chronologist has a 27% win rate across 1617 recorded Playgroup games (442 wins, 1175 losses).
How long do winning games with Obeka, Brute Chronologist take? ▾
Wins with Obeka, Brute Chronologist take on average 9 turns. Total tracked play time: 19 days.
How many decks use Obeka, Brute Chronologist? ▾
631 decks list Obeka, Brute Chronologist as their commander on Playgroup, of which 316 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1625 | Codexsca | 34 | 13 |
| 2 | 1581 | Marco Lecci | 27 | 8 |
| 3 | 1558 | Tobivanwesterop@gmail.com | 10 | 3 |
| 4 | 1552 | Its_Blex | 9 | 4 |
| 5 | 1536 | WizardGang | 1 | 1 |
How does this commander win?
When Obeka, Brute Chronologist wins, 71.63% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Obeka, Brute Chronologist wins 32.21% of games from position 1 and 5.88% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Obeka, Brute Chronologist wins 26.94% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Obeka, Brute Chronologist 3.68/5 on average, across 1051 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Obeka, Brute Chronologist wins, opponents flag the game as salty 62.0% of the time across 447 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Obeka, Brute Chronologist. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
