Data-Backed · Win Rates
Green Commanders
Green commanders have a 25.6% win rate across 21,497 games tracked in the last 365 days on Playgroup.gg, above the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
88
Ranked
21,497
Games
Win Rate
25.6%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
21,497
Last 365 Days
Avg Game Length
1h 27m
8.3 rounds
Commanders
88
With 40+ games
Win Conditions
Green commanders most commonly win through Combat (66.2% of wins) across 21,497 tracked games.
Combat
66.2%
Commander Damage
14.6%
Poison
5.8%
Non Combat Damage
4.7%
Combo
4.5%
Alternative
3.1%
Mill
1.1%
Game Concentration
14 commanders account for 50% of all Green games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
14
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
232 of 364 Green commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
63.7%
Coverage
232 played
364 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Green Commanders by Win Rate
88
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 40.19% | 135 | ▲+7.15% | |
| 2 | S | 38.75% | 40 | ▲+14.31% | |
| 3 | S | 35.64% | 141 | NEW | |
| 4 | S | 35.56% | 45 | ~ | |
| 5 | A | 34.34% | 1218 | ~ | |
| 6 | A | 34.23% | 84 | ▲+9.23% | |
| 7 | A | 32.89% | 491 | ▲+3.19% | |
| 8 | A | 32.5% | 130 | ~ | |
| 9 | A | 32.49% | 207 | NEW | |
| 10 | A | 31.25% | 120 | ▼-5.87% | |
| 11 | A | 31.19% | 97 | ▲+4.63% | |
| 12 | A | 31.05% | 62 | NEW | |
| 13 | A | 30.32% | 155 | ~ | |
| 14 | B | 29.88% | 41 | ▼-5.46% | |
| 15 | B | 29.67% | 166 | ▲+7.12% | |
| 16 | B | 29.62% | 747 | ~ | |
| 17 | B | 29.46% | 280 | ~ | |
| 18 | B | 28.9% | 77 | ▼-10.86% | |
| 19 | B | 28.41% | 66 | NEW | |
| 20 | B | 28.01% | 158 | NEW | |
| 21 | B | 27.98% | 42 | NEW | |
| 22 | B | 27.92% | 171 | ▲+3.4% | |
| 23 | B | 27.71% | 129 | ▼-3.83% | |
| 24 | B | 27.54% | 59 | ~ | |
| 25 | B | 27.44% | 1148 | ▼-3.01% | |
| 26 | B | 27.38% | 42 | NEW | |
| 27 | B | 27.33% | 43 | NEW | |
| 28 | B | 27.3% | 76 | ~ | |
| 29 | B | 27.27% | 77 | NEW | |
| 30 | B | 27.24% | 257 | ~ | |
| 31 | B | 27.13% | 94 | ▲+5.02% | |
| 32 | B | 27.06% | 703 | ~ | |
| 33 | B | 26.99% | 514 | ~ | |
| 34 | B | 26.74% | 1066 | ~ | |
| 35 | B | 26.63% | 92 | ▼-11.87% | |
| 36 | B | 26.62% | 896 | ▲+4.8% | |
| 37 | B | 26.46% | 154 | ▼-6.39% | |
| 38 | B | 26.22% | 473 | ▲+3.29% | |
| 39 | B | 26.14% | 1075 | ~ | |
| 40 | B | 26.06% | 377 | ~ | |
| 41 | B | 25.66% | 114 | ~ | |
| 42 | B | 25.46% | 54 | ▼-4.54% | |
| 43 | B | 25.19% | 133 | ~ | |
| 44 | B | 25.13% | 560 | ~ | |
| 45 | B | 25.0% | 73 | ▲+6.91% | |
| 46 | B | 25.0% | 171 | ~ | |
| 47 | B | 25.0% | 74 | ▼-5.05% | |
| 48 | B | 24.63% | 202 | ▼-5.85% | |
| 49 | B | 24.58% | 60 | NEW | |
| 50 | B | 24.55% | 55 | ▲+3.44% | |
| 51 | B | 24.51% | 360 | ▼-3.14% | |
| 52 | B | 24.26% | 101 | ~ | |
| 53 | B | 23.94% | 47 | ▲+3.83% | |
| 54 | B | 23.65% | 241 | ▼-3.54% | |
| 55 | B | 23.57% | 70 | ~ | |
| 56 | B | 23.26% | 43 | ~ | |
| 57 | B | 23.04% | 51 | NEW | |
| 58 | B | 23.0% | 300 | ~ | |
| 59 | C | 22.83% | 300 | ~ | |
| 60 | C | 22.78% | 203 | ~ | |
| 61 | C | 22.62% | 42 | NEW | |
| 62 | C | 22.62% | 430 | ~ | |
| 63 | C | 22.4% | 750 | ~ | |
| 64 | C | 22.3% | 342 | NEW | |
| 65 | C | 22.29% | 129 | ▲+4.3% | |
| 66 | C | 22.11% | 95 | ▼-3.37% | |
| 67 | C | 21.13% | 71 | ▼-6.9% | |
| 68 | C | 20.82% | 323 | ▼-4.18% | |
| 69 | C | 20.46% | 1108 | ~ | |
| 70 | C | 19.5% | 50 | ▼-4.48% | |
| 71 | C | 19.39% | 49 | NEW | |
| 72 | C | 19.38% | 40 | NEW | |
| 73 | C | 18.93% | 169 | ~ | |
| 74 | C | 18.9% | 205 | ~ | |
| 75 | C | 18.88% | 49 | NEW | |
| 76 | C | 18.51% | 412 | ~ | |
| 77 | C | 18.5% | 50 | NEW | |
| 78 | C | 18.4% | 159 | ▼-6.94% | |
| 79 | C | 18.4% | 53 | ~ | |
| 80 | C | 18.37% | 49 | NEW | |
| 81 | C | 18.2% | 169 | ~ | |
| 82 | C | 18.08% | 177 | ~ | |
| 83 | D | 17.43% | 76 | NEW | |
| 84 | D | 17.21% | 61 | ▼-10.87% | |
| 85 | D | 16.67% | 51 | ▼-7.12% | |
| 86 | D | 14.85% | 101 | NEW | |
| 87 | D | 11.46% | 48 | NEW | |
| 88 | D | 11.23% | 69 | ▼-11.97% |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Green
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Green commanders?
Green commanders have a 25.6% win rate across 21,497 tracked casual Commander games in the last 365 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Green commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 88 Green commanders with at least 40 recorded games and at least 7 distinct registered pilots in the last 365 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Green commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Green data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 365 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: